From 862fa2485c77611532d21e18c92595b34f767ff7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas White Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:47:54 +0200 Subject: speed.rst: Mention --asdf-fast --- doc/articles/speed.rst | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/articles/speed.rst b/doc/articles/speed.rst index f4c4808d..b63e6164 100644 --- a/doc/articles/speed.rst +++ b/doc/articles/speed.rst @@ -85,10 +85,15 @@ results. Choose the fastest indexing algorithms ====================================== -Don't use PinkIndexer, unless you really need it (wide bandwidth or electron -diffraction data). PinkIndexer is a very general and accurate indexing -algorithm, but these advantages must be "paid for" in speed. Prefer DirAx, -TakeTwo, Mosflm and XGandalf. +In our tests, ``asdf`` gives the best compromise between speed and success +rate, so it's the best choice if you need fast processing. The ``indexamajig`` +option ``--asdf-fast`` makes it about three times faster with only a small +reduction in success rate. + +DirAx, TakeTwo, Mosflm and XGandalf are also good choices (roughly in that +order). Don't use PinkIndexer, unless you really need it (wide bandwidth or +electron diffraction data). PinkIndexer is a very general and accurate +indexing algorithm, but these advantages must be "paid for" in speed. Try less hard to index each frame -- cgit v1.2.3