From 4398834ad2897c83987d8537ea305d84f6d7b64c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas White <taw@physics.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:56:11 +0100
Subject: Don't try to use unscalable reflections for post refinement

---
 src/hrs-scaling.c | 23 -----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/hrs-scaling.c')

diff --git a/src/hrs-scaling.c b/src/hrs-scaling.c
index 8e17bee7..c0308483 100644
--- a/src/hrs-scaling.c
+++ b/src/hrs-scaling.c
@@ -375,29 +375,6 @@ double *scale_intensities(struct image *images, int n, const char *sym,
 	/* Start with all scale factors equal */
 	for ( m=0; m<n; m++ ) images[m].osf = 1.0;
 
-	/* Decide which reflections can be scaled */
-	for ( m=0; m<n; m++ ) {
-
-		int j;
-
-		for ( j=0; j<images[m].n_cpeaks; j++ ) {
-
-			int scalable = 1;
-
-			if ( images[m].cpeaks[j].p < 0.1 ) scalable = 0;
-			if ( !images[m].cpeaks[j].valid ) {
-				scalable = 0;
-			} else {
-				double v = fabs(images[m].cpeaks[j].intensity);
-				if ( v < 0.1 ) scalable = 0;
-			}
-
-			images[m].cpeaks[j].scalable = scalable;
-
-		}
-
-	}
-
 	/* Iterate */
 	i = 0;
 	do {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3