From 990fd486a0dc069d81344c9f6370f1a80e3d5ec9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas White <taw@physics.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:20:08 +0100
Subject: Don't use next_found_refl() on a reflection we just freed

---
 tests/list_check.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'tests')

diff --git a/tests/list_check.c b/tests/list_check.c
index 08bb09d5..04b337d0 100644
--- a/tests/list_check.c
+++ b/tests/list_check.c
@@ -201,15 +201,14 @@ static int test_lists(int num_items)
 		l = check[i].l;
 		refl = find_refl(list, h, k, l);
 
-		printf("%i copies remaining, %p\n", check[i].num, refl);
-
 		do {
 			int j;
 			signed int ha, ka, la;
+			Reflection *next;
 			get_indices(refl, &ha, &ka, &la);
-			printf("removing %p %i %i %i\n", refl, ha, ka, la);
+			next = next_found_refl(refl);
 			delete_refl(refl);
-			refl = next_found_refl(refl);
+			refl = next;
 			for ( j=0; j<num_items; j++ ) {
 				if ( (check[j].h == h) && (check[j].k == k)
 				  && (check[j].l == l) ) check[j].num--;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3