diff options
author | Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk> | 2006-06-15 18:00:34 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2006-06-18 16:17:41 +0100 |
commit | ce7a3fdc5c55fd01d8e2deda0daef84473644f8b (patch) | |
tree | b2aad3635d9026b0cf9c415cffc6345f0af05295 | |
parent | 427abfa28afedffadfca9dd8b067eb6d36bac53f (diff) |
[ARM] Remove rt_sigframe puc and pinfo pointers
These two members appear to be surplus to requirements. Discussing
this issue with glibc folk:
| > Additionally, do you see any need for these weird "puc" and "pinfo"
| > pointers in the kernels rt_sigframe structure? Can we kill them?
|
| We can kill them. I checked with Phil B. about them last week, and he
| didn't remember any reason they still needed to be there. And nothing
| should know where they are on the stack. Unfortunately, doing this
| will upset GDB, which knows that the saved registers are 0x88 bytes
| above the stack pointer on entrance to an rt signal trampoline; but,
| since puc and pinfo are quite recognizable, I can adapt GDB to support
| the new layout if you want to remove them.
So remove them.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c index a0cd0a90a10..0ddbf2795c5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c @@ -200,8 +200,6 @@ struct sigframe { }; struct rt_sigframe { - struct siginfo __user *pinfo; - void __user *puc; struct siginfo info; struct ucontext uc; unsigned long retcode[2]; @@ -511,8 +509,6 @@ setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, if (!frame) return 1; - __put_user_error(&frame->info, &frame->pinfo, err); - __put_user_error(&frame->uc, &frame->puc, err); err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, info); __put_user_error(0, &frame->uc.uc_flags, err); |