aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86/system_32.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-10-19i386: consolidate show_regs and show_registers for i386Pavel Emelyanov
Both functions printk the same information, except for CRx and debug registers in the show_registers() one and a bit different manner. So move the common code into one place. This is already done for x86_64, so I think it's worth having the same on i386. This saves 100 bytes of .rodata section :) ... but only 8 from .text :( [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-17x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvdH. Peter Anvin
Create an inline function for clflush(), with the proper arguments, and use it instead of hard-coding the instruction. This also removes one instance of hard-coded wbinvd, based on a patch by Bauder de Oliveira Costa. [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-17x86: mark read_crX() asm code as volatileKirill Korotaev
Some gcc versions (I checked at least 4.1.1 from RHEL5 & 4.1.2 from gentoo) can generate incorrect code with read_crX()/write_crX() functions mix up, due to cached results of read_crX(). The small app for x8664 below compiled with -O2 demonstrates this (i686 does the same thing):
2007-10-17increase AT_VECTOR_SIZE to terminate saved_auxv properlyOlaf Hering
include/asm-powerpc/elf.h has 6 entries in ARCH_DLINFO. fs/binfmt_elf.c has 14 unconditional NEW_AUX_ENT entries and 2 conditional NEW_AUX_ENT entries. So in the worst case, saved_auxv does not get an AT_NULL entry at the end. The saved_auxv array must be terminated with an AT_NULL entry. Make the size of mm_struct->saved_auxv arch dependend, based on the number of ARCH_DLINFO entries. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-12x86: optimise barriersNick Piggin
According to latest memory ordering specification documents from Intel and AMD, both manufacturers are committed to in-order loads from cacheable memory for the x86 architecture. Hence, smp_rmb() may be a simple barrier. Also according to those documents, and according to existing practice in Linux (eg. spin_unlock doesn't enforce ordering), stores to cacheable memory are visible in program order too. Special string stores are safe -- their constituent stores may be out of order, but they must complete in order WRT surrounding stores. Nontemporal stores to WB memory can go out of order, and so they should be fenced explicitly to make them appear in-order WRT other stores. Hence, smp_wmb() may be a simple barrier. http://developer.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/318147.pdf http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24593.pdf In userspace microbenchmarks on a core2 system, fence instructions range anywhere from around 15 cycles to 50, which may not be totally insignificant in performance critical paths (code size will go down too). However the primary motivation for this is to have the canonical barrier implementation for x86 architecture. smp_rmb on buggy pentium pros remains a locked op, which is apparently required. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-12x86: fix IO write barrierNick Piggin
wmb() on x86 must always include a barrier, because stores can go out of order in many cases when dealing with devices (eg. WC memory). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>