From 228adef16d6e7b7725ef6b9ba760810d5966afa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:37:10 +0100 Subject: [ARM] vfp: make fpexc bit names less verbose Use the fpexc abbreviated names instead of long verbose names for fpexc bits. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S') diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S index d4b7b229631..0ac022f800a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S @@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ vfp_support_entry: VFPFMRX r1, FPEXC @ Is the VFP enabled? DBGSTR1 "fpexc %08x", r1 - tst r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE + tst r1, #FPEXC_EN bne look_for_VFP_exceptions @ VFP is already enabled DBGSTR1 "enable %x", r10 ldr r3, last_VFP_context_address - orr r1, r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE @ user FPEXC has the enable bit set + orr r1, r1, #FPEXC_EN @ user FPEXC has the enable bit set ldr r4, [r3, r11, lsl #2] @ last_VFP_context pointer - bic r5, r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION @ make sure exceptions are disabled + bic r5, r1, #FPEXC_EX @ make sure exceptions are disabled cmp r4, r10 beq check_for_exception @ we are returning to the same @ process, so the registers are @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ no_old_VFP_process: VFPFMXR FPSCR, r5 @ restore status check_for_exception: - tst r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION + tst r1, #FPEXC_EX bne process_exception @ might as well handle the pending @ exception before retrying branch @ out before setting an FPEXC that @@ -136,10 +136,10 @@ check_for_exception: look_for_VFP_exceptions: - tst r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION + tst r1, #FPEXC_EX bne process_exception VFPFMRX r5, FPSCR - tst r5, #FPSCR_IXE @ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EXCEPTION ! + tst r5, #FPSCR_IXE @ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EX ! bne process_exception @ Fall into hand on to next handler - appropriate coproc instr -- cgit v1.2.3