From 5d4cae5fe2ea1a0974962e2c49dca5c9c4b14cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:22:20 +0100 Subject: [ARM] VFP: fix section mismatch error Fix a real section mismatch issue; the test code is thrown away after initialisation, but if we do not detect the VFP hardware, it is left hooked into the exception handler. Any VFP instructions which are subsequently executed risk calling the discarded exception handler. Introduce a new "null" handler which returns to the "unrecognised fault" return address. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/vfp/entry.S | 4 ++++ arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm') diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S b/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S index ca2a5ad19ea..806ce26d524 100644 --- a/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ do_vfp: add r10, r10, #TI_VFPSTATE @ r10 = workspace ldr pc, [r4] @ call VFP entry point +ENTRY(vfp_null_entry) + mov pc, lr +ENDPROC(vfp_null_entry) + .LCvfp: .word vfp_vector diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c index f1e5951dc72..1106b5f9cf1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c @@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ */ void vfp_testing_entry(void); void vfp_support_entry(void); +void vfp_null_entry(void); -void (*vfp_vector)(void) = vfp_testing_entry; +void (*vfp_vector)(void) = vfp_null_entry; union vfp_state *last_VFP_context[NR_CPUS]; /* @@ -321,8 +322,10 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void) * The handler is already setup to just log calls, so * we just need to read the VFPSID register. */ + vfp_vector = vfp_testing_entry; vfpsid = fmrx(FPSID); barrier(); + vfp_vector = vfp_null_entry; printk(KERN_INFO "VFP support v0.3: "); if (VFP_arch) { -- cgit v1.2.3