From 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:55:58 -0500 Subject: Generic semaphore implementation Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the unlikely() was unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Acked-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c | 221 -------------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 222 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c (limited to 'arch/arm') diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile index 00d44c6fbfe..6235f72a14f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ AFLAGS_head.o := -DTEXT_OFFSET=$(TEXT_OFFSET) # Object file lists. obj-y := compat.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \ - process.o ptrace.o semaphore.o setup.o signal.o \ + process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o \ sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o obj-$(CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API) += dma.o diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c deleted file mode 100644 index 981fe5c6ccb..00000000000 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,221 +0,0 @@ -/* - * ARM semaphore implementation, taken from - * - * i386 semaphore implementation. - * - * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds - * - * Modified for ARM by Russell King - * - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as - * published by the Free Software Foundation. - */ -#include -#include -#include -#include - -#include - -/* - * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: - * The "count" variable is decremented for each process - * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" - * variable is a count of such acquires. - * - * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can - * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up - * needs to do something only if count was negative before - * the increment operation. - * - * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is - * protected by the semaphore spinlock. - * - * Note that these functions are only called when there is - * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the - * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The - * critical part is the inline stuff in - * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. - */ - -/* - * Logic: - * - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go - * from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. - * - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we - * (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure - * that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that - * we cannot lose wakeup events. - */ - -void __up(struct semaphore *sem) -{ - wake_up(&sem->wait); -} - -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(semaphore_lock); - -void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - struct task_struct *tsk = current; - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); - tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; - add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait); - - spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - sem->sleepers++; - for (;;) { - int sleepers = sem->sleepers; - - /* - * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { - sem->sleepers = 0; - break; - } - sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ - spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - - schedule(); - tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; - spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - } - spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait); - tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; - wake_up(&sem->wait); -} - -int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int retval = 0; - struct task_struct *tsk = current; - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); - tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; - add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait); - - spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - sem->sleepers ++; - for (;;) { - int sleepers = sem->sleepers; - - /* - * With signals pending, this turns into - * the trylock failure case - we won't be - * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as - * it has contention. Just correct the count - * and exit. - */ - if (signal_pending(current)) { - retval = -EINTR; - sem->sleepers = 0; - atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count); - break; - } - - /* - * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock. The - * "-1" is because we're still hoping to get - * the lock. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { - sem->sleepers = 0; - break; - } - sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ - spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - - schedule(); - tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; - spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - } - spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock); - tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; - remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait); - wake_up(&sem->wait); - return retval; -} - -/* - * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for - * having decremented the count. - * - * We could have done the trylock with a - * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases, - * but then it wouldn't work on a 386. - */ -int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int sleepers; - unsigned long flags; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_lock, flags); - sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1; - sem->sleepers = 0; - - /* - * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) - wake_up(&sem->wait); - - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_lock, flags); - return 1; -} - -/* - * The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that - * allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines - * need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when - * there is contention on the semaphore. - * - * ip contains the semaphore pointer on entry. Save the C-clobbered - * registers (r0 to r3 and lr), but not ip, as we use it as a return - * value in some cases.. - * To remain AAPCS compliant (64-bit stack align) we save r4 as well. - */ -asm(" .section .sched.text,\"ax\",%progbits \n\ - .align 5 \n\ - .globl __down_failed \n\ -__down_failed: \n\ - stmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, lr} \n\ - mov r0, ip \n\ - bl __down \n\ - ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, pc} \n\ - \n\ - .align 5 \n\ - .globl __down_interruptible_failed \n\ -__down_interruptible_failed: \n\ - stmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, lr} \n\ - mov r0, ip \n\ - bl __down_interruptible \n\ - mov ip, r0 \n\ - ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, pc} \n\ - \n\ - .align 5 \n\ - .globl __down_trylock_failed \n\ -__down_trylock_failed: \n\ - stmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, lr} \n\ - mov r0, ip \n\ - bl __down_trylock \n\ - mov ip, r0 \n\ - ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, pc} \n\ - \n\ - .align 5 \n\ - .globl __up_wakeup \n\ -__up_wakeup: \n\ - stmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, lr} \n\ - mov r0, ip \n\ - bl __up \n\ - ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r4, pc} \n\ - "); - -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible_failed); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock_failed); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_wakeup); -- cgit v1.2.3