From 84dd619e4dc3b0b1c40dafd98c90fd950bce7bc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dale Farnsworth Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:40:28 -0700 Subject: mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data We were using the platform_device.id field to identify which ethernet port is used for mv643xx_eth device. This is not generally correct. It will be incorrect, for example, if a hardware platform uses a single port but not the first port. Here, we add an explicit port_number field to struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data. This makes the mv643xx_eth_platform_data structure required, but that isn't an issue since all users currently provide it already. Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/ppc/syslib') diff --git a/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c b/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c index 3b039c30a43..a6f8b686ea8 100644 --- a/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c +++ b/arch/ppc/syslib/mv64x60.c @@ -339,7 +339,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth0_resources[] = { }, }; -static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth0_pd; +static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth0_pd = { + .port_number = 0, +}; static struct platform_device eth0_device = { .name = MV643XX_ETH_NAME, @@ -362,7 +364,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth1_resources[] = { }, }; -static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth1_pd; +static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth1_pd = { + .port_number = 1, +}; static struct platform_device eth1_device = { .name = MV643XX_ETH_NAME, @@ -385,7 +389,9 @@ static struct resource mv64x60_eth2_resources[] = { }, }; -static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth2_pd; +static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data eth2_pd = { + .port_number = 2, +}; static struct platform_device eth2_device = { .name = MV643XX_ETH_NAME, -- cgit v1.2.3