From 205516c12dbba003c26b42cfb41e598631300106 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Chen Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:32:21 -0800 Subject: x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc Impact: micro-optimization Is there any reason why x86 rdtscll have to use the out of line function instead of inline __native_read_tsc()? native_read_tsc and __native_read_tsc is essentially the same functions. Patch to let x86 rdtscll() to use the inline version of read_tsc. Signed-off-by: Ken Chen Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h index c2a812ebde8..42f639b991b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h @@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ static inline int rdmsrl_amd_safe(unsigned msr, unsigned long long *p) } #define rdtscl(low) \ - ((low) = (u32)native_read_tsc()) + ((low) = (u32)__native_read_tsc()) #define rdtscll(val) \ - ((val) = native_read_tsc()) + ((val) = __native_read_tsc()) #define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \ do { \ -- cgit v1.2.3