From 65ea5b0349903585bfed9720fa06f5edb4f1cd25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:30:56 +0100 Subject: x86: rename the struct pt_regs members for 32/64-bit consistency We have a lot of code which differs only by the naming of specific members of structures that contain registers. In order to enable additional unifications, this patch drops the e- or r- size prefix from the register names in struct pt_regs, and drops the x- prefixes for segment registers on the 32-bit side. This patch also performs the equivalent renames in some additional places that might be candidates for unification in the future. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c index f88bf6b802e..bf0bcc9bb00 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs); /* Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy - of eflags from PUSHF + of flags from PUSHF Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses. */ if (!user_mode(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) { - unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->rsp; + unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp; if (sp[0] >> 22) return sp[0]; if (sp[1] >> 22) -- cgit v1.2.3