From a6a95406c676ffe4f9dee708eb404a17c69f7fdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:40:31 +0300 Subject: x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64 There's a small problem with hpet_rtc_reinit function - it checks for the: hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp > 0 to continue increasing both the HPET_T1_CMP (register) and the hpet_t1_cmp (variable). But since the HPET_COUNTER is always 32-bit, if the hpet_t1_cmp is 64-bit this condition will always be FALSE once the latter hits the 32-bit boundary, and we can have a situation, when we don't increase the HPET_T1_CMP register high enough. The result - timer stops ticking, since HPET_T1_CMP becomes less, than the COUNTER and never increased again. The solution is (based on Linus's suggestion) to not compare 64-bits (on 64-bit x86), but to do the comparison on 32-bit signed integers. Reported-by: Kirill Korotaev Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c index 64d5ad0b8ad..c761f914430 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ static void hpet_rtc_timer_reinit(void) hpet_t1_cmp += delta; hpet_writel(hpet_t1_cmp, HPET_T1_CMP); lost_ints++; - } while ((long)(hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp) > 0); + } while ((s32)(hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp) > 0); if (lost_ints) { if (hpet_rtc_flags & RTC_PIE) -- cgit v1.2.3