From 7f172890a8f8744c4005c267ae9e228411ab173f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:58:03 +1100 Subject: [POWERPC] Fix bogus test for unassigned PCI resources A bogus test for unassigned resources that came from our 32-bit PCI code ended up being "merged" by my previous patch series, breaking some 64-bit setups where devices have legal resources ending at 0xffffffff. This fixes it by completely changing the test. We now test for res->start == 0, as the generic code expects, and we also only do so on platforms that don't have the PPC_PCI_PROBE_ONLY flag set, as there are cases of pSeries and iSeries where it could be a valid value and those can't reassign devices. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras --- arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c index 980fe32895c..89c83ccb85c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c @@ -748,7 +748,13 @@ static void __devinit pcibios_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) struct resource *res = dev->resource + i; if (!res->flags) continue; - if (res->end == 0xffffffff) { + /* On platforms that have PPC_PCI_PROBE_ONLY set, we don't + * consider 0 as an unassigned BAR value. It's technically + * a valid value, but linux doesn't like it... so when we can + * re-assign things, we do so, but if we can't, we keep it + * around and hope for the best... + */ + if (res->start == 0 && !(ppc_pci_flags & PPC_PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) { pr_debug("PCI:%s Resource %d %016llx-%016llx [%x] is unassigned\n", pci_name(dev), i, (unsigned long long)res->start, -- cgit v1.2.3