From 41ce921440bd14d9b69b19fbf47d9278582739fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:50:00 +0000 Subject: [MTD] NAND: Allow operation without bad block table Small bugfix. Sometimes it may be handy not to have bbt. So, this->bbt might be NULL. Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nand') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 99abd615a46..1806ffae245 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ * The AG-AND chips have nice features for speed improvement, * which are not supported yet. Read / program 4 pages in one go. * - * $Id: nand_base.c,v 1.131 2005/02/09 12:19:56 gleixner Exp $ + * $Id: nand_base.c,v 1.132 2005/02/09 14:49:56 dedekind Exp $ * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as @@ -461,7 +461,8 @@ static int nand_default_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs) /* Get block number */ block = ((int) ofs) >> this->bbt_erase_shift; - this->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1); + if (this->bbt) + this->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1); /* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */ if (this->options & NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT) -- cgit v1.2.3