From a2db8dfce8d94fecae50128d912fec7980687a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:35:08 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] rtc framewok: rtc_wkalrm.enabled reporting updates Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc code, which originated that reporting API). Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here... Signed-off-by: David Brownell Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c') diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c index e301dea57bb..f406a2b55ae 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static int s3c_rtc_getalarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) alm_en = readb(base + S3C2410_RTCALM); + alrm->enabled = (alm_en & S3C2410_RTCALM_ALMEN) ? 1 : 0; + pr_debug("read alarm %02x %02x.%02x.%02x %02x/%02x/%02x\n", alm_en, alm_tm->tm_year, alm_tm->tm_mon, alm_tm->tm_mday, @@ -331,12 +333,8 @@ static int s3c_rtc_ioctl(struct device *dev, static int s3c_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq) { - unsigned int rtcalm = readb(s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_RTCALM); unsigned int ticnt = readb(s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_TICNT); - seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n", - (rtcalm & S3C2410_RTCALM_ALMEN) ? "yes" : "no" ); - seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n", (ticnt & S3C2410_TICNT_ENABLE) ? "yes" : "no" ); -- cgit v1.2.3