From 79a8810221ee9ea96c4e5a5817afb88f22ea698c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Henderson Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] alpha: fix "statement with no effect" warnings Apparently gcc 4.0 complains about "({ 0; });", which leads to -Werror breakage in one of the alpha oprofile modules. One might could argue that this is a gcc bug, in that statement-expressions should be considered to be function-like rather than statement-like for the purposes of this warning. But it's just as easy to use an inline function in the first place, side-stepping the issue. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/asm-alpha/smp.h | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/asm-alpha/smp.h') diff --git a/include/asm-alpha/smp.h b/include/asm-alpha/smp.h index 9950706abdf..a3d09d14fee 100644 --- a/include/asm-alpha/smp.h +++ b/include/asm-alpha/smp.h @@ -50,11 +50,16 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_online_map; extern int smp_num_cpus; #define cpu_possible_map cpu_present_mask -int smp_call_function_on_cpu(void (*func) (void *info), void *info,int retry, int wait, cpumask_t cpu); +int smp_call_function_on_cpu(void (*) (void *), void *, int, int, cpumask_t); #else /* CONFIG_SMP */ -#define smp_call_function_on_cpu(func,info,retry,wait,cpu) ({ 0; }) +static inline int +smp_call_function_on_cpu (void (*func) (void *), void *info, int retry, + int wait, cpumask_t cpu) +{ + return 0; +} #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -- cgit v1.2.3