From bd2b5b12849a3446abad0b25e920f86f5480b309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:40:57 +0200 Subject: perf_counter: More aggressive frequency adjustment Also employ the overflow handler to adjust the frequency, this results in a stable frequency in about 40~50 samples, instead of that many ticks. This also means we can start sampling at a sample period of 1 without running head-first into the throttle. It relies on sched_clock() to accurately measure the time difference between the overflow NMIs. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo LKML-Reference: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/perf_counter.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/perf_counter.c') diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c index 5eacaaf3f9c..51c571ee4d0 100644 --- a/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -1184,13 +1184,33 @@ static void perf_counter_cpu_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx, int cpu) static void perf_log_throttle(struct perf_counter *counter, int enable); static void perf_log_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 period); -static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx) +static void perf_adjust_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 events) +{ + struct hw_perf_counter *hwc = &counter->hw; + u64 period, sample_period; + s64 delta; + + events *= hwc->sample_period; + period = div64_u64(events, counter->attr.sample_freq); + + delta = (s64)(period - hwc->sample_period); + delta = (delta + 7) / 8; /* low pass filter */ + + sample_period = hwc->sample_period + delta; + + if (!sample_period) + sample_period = 1; + + perf_log_period(counter, sample_period); + + hwc->sample_period = sample_period; +} + +static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx) { struct perf_counter *counter; struct hw_perf_counter *hwc; - u64 interrupts, sample_period; - u64 events, period, freq; - s64 delta; + u64 interrupts, freq; spin_lock(&ctx->lock); list_for_each_entry(counter, &ctx->counter_list, list_entry) { @@ -1202,6 +1222,9 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx) interrupts = hwc->interrupts; hwc->interrupts = 0; + /* + * unthrottle counters on the tick + */ if (interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) { perf_log_throttle(counter, 1); counter->pmu->unthrottle(counter); @@ -1211,6 +1234,9 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx) if (!counter->attr.freq || !counter->attr.sample_freq) continue; + /* + * if the specified freq < HZ then we need to skip ticks + */ if (counter->attr.sample_freq < HZ) { freq = counter->attr.sample_freq; @@ -1226,20 +1252,20 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq(struct perf_counter_context *ctx) } else freq = HZ; - events = freq * interrupts * hwc->sample_period; - period = div64_u64(events, counter->attr.sample_freq); - - delta = (s64)(1 + period - hwc->sample_period); - delta >>= 1; - - sample_period = hwc->sample_period + delta; - - if (!sample_period) - sample_period = 1; + perf_adjust_period(counter, freq * interrupts); - perf_log_period(counter, sample_period); - - hwc->sample_period = sample_period; + /* + * In order to avoid being stalled by an (accidental) huge + * sample period, force reset the sample period if we didn't + * get any events in this freq period. + */ + if (!interrupts) { + perf_disable(); + counter->pmu->disable(counter); + atomic_set(&hwc->period_left, 0); + counter->pmu->enable(counter); + perf_enable(); + } } spin_unlock(&ctx->lock); } @@ -1279,9 +1305,9 @@ void perf_counter_task_tick(struct task_struct *curr, int cpu) cpuctx = &per_cpu(perf_cpu_context, cpu); ctx = curr->perf_counter_ctxp; - perf_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx); + perf_ctx_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx); if (ctx) - perf_adjust_freq(ctx); + perf_ctx_adjust_freq(ctx); perf_counter_cpu_sched_out(cpuctx); if (ctx) @@ -1647,10 +1673,10 @@ static int perf_counter_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 __user *arg) counter->attr.sample_freq = value; } else { + perf_log_period(counter, value); + counter->attr.sample_period = value; counter->hw.sample_period = value; - - perf_log_period(counter, value); } unlock: spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); @@ -2853,35 +2879,41 @@ void __perf_counter_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma) * event flow. */ +struct freq_event { + struct perf_event_header header; + u64 time; + u64 id; + u64 period; +}; + static void perf_log_period(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 period) { struct perf_output_handle handle; + struct freq_event event; int ret; - struct { - struct perf_event_header header; - u64 time; - u64 id; - u64 period; - } freq_event = { + if (counter->hw.sample_period == period) + return; + + if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD) + return; + + event = (struct freq_event) { .header = { .type = PERF_EVENT_PERIOD, .misc = 0, - .size = sizeof(freq_event), + .size = sizeof(event), }, .time = sched_clock(), .id = counter->id, .period = period, }; - if (counter->hw.sample_period == period) - return; - - ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, sizeof(freq_event), 0, 0); + ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, sizeof(event), 1, 0); if (ret) return; - perf_output_put(&handle, freq_event); + perf_output_put(&handle, event); perf_output_end(&handle); } @@ -2923,15 +2955,16 @@ int perf_counter_overflow(struct perf_counter *counter, { int events = atomic_read(&counter->event_limit); int throttle = counter->pmu->unthrottle != NULL; + struct hw_perf_counter *hwc = &counter->hw; int ret = 0; if (!throttle) { - counter->hw.interrupts++; + hwc->interrupts++; } else { - if (counter->hw.interrupts != MAX_INTERRUPTS) { - counter->hw.interrupts++; - if (HZ*counter->hw.interrupts > (u64)sysctl_perf_counter_limit) { - counter->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS; + if (hwc->interrupts != MAX_INTERRUPTS) { + hwc->interrupts++; + if (HZ * hwc->interrupts > (u64)sysctl_perf_counter_limit) { + hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS; perf_log_throttle(counter, 0); ret = 1; } @@ -2945,6 +2978,16 @@ int perf_counter_overflow(struct perf_counter *counter, } } + if (counter->attr.freq) { + u64 now = sched_clock(); + s64 delta = now - hwc->freq_stamp; + + hwc->freq_stamp = now; + + if (delta > 0 && delta < TICK_NSEC) + perf_adjust_period(counter, NSEC_PER_SEC / (int)delta); + } + /* * XXX event_limit might not quite work as expected on inherited * counters @@ -3379,7 +3422,6 @@ static const struct pmu *tp_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter) return NULL; counter->destroy = tp_perf_counter_destroy; - counter->hw.sample_period = counter->attr.sample_period; return &perf_ops_generic; } @@ -3483,10 +3525,11 @@ perf_counter_alloc(struct perf_counter_attr *attr, pmu = NULL; hwc = &counter->hw; + hwc->sample_period = attr->sample_period; if (attr->freq && attr->sample_freq) - hwc->sample_period = div64_u64(TICK_NSEC, attr->sample_freq); - else - hwc->sample_period = attr->sample_period; + hwc->sample_period = 1; + + atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period); /* * we currently do not support PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP on inherited counters @@ -3687,6 +3730,9 @@ inherit_counter(struct perf_counter *parent_counter, else child_counter->state = PERF_COUNTER_STATE_OFF; + if (parent_counter->attr.freq) + child_counter->hw.sample_period = parent_counter->hw.sample_period; + /* * Link it up in the child's context: */ -- cgit v1.2.3