From 295f7324ff8d9ea58b4d3ec93b1aaa1d80e048a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:11:56 -0700 Subject: [ICSK]: Introduce reqsk_queue_prune from code in tcp_synack_timer With this we're very close to getting all of the current TCP refactorings in my dccp-2.6 tree merged, next changeset will export some functions needed by the current DCCP code and then dccp-2.6.git will be born! Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c') diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c index 4cfbe1d1c92..2d95afe5b39 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c @@ -787,9 +787,10 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb, does sequence test, SYN is truncated, and thus we consider it a bare ACK. - If tp->defer_accept, we silently drop this bare ACK. Otherwise, - we create an established connection. Both ends (listening sockets) - accept the new incoming connection and try to talk to each other. 8-) + If icsk->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept, we silently drop this + bare ACK. Otherwise, we create an established connection. Both + ends (listening sockets) accept the new incoming connection and try + to talk to each other. 8-) Note: This case is both harmless, and rare. Possibility is about the same as us discovering intelligent life on another plant tomorrow. @@ -856,7 +857,8 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb, return NULL; /* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */ - if (tp->defer_accept && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) { + if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept && + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) { inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1; return NULL; } -- cgit v1.2.3