diff options
| author | Kristen Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> | 2007-03-09 18:15:33 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> | 2007-03-09 18:15:33 -0500 |
| commit | df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c (patch) | |
| tree | 414f7c4392a14b70f114c2d10dcd6f1477dd61a0 | |
| parent | 908e0a8a265fe8057604a9a30aec3f0be7bb5ebb (diff) | |
libata-acpi: allow _GTF on SATA, but disable on PATA for now
The ACPI specification states, and BIOS implementations depend on,
_STM being called before _GTF.
SATA does this, but PATA does not. So for now, simply
prevent execution of _GTF on PATA devices. Longer term we
should implement ACPI support for PATA devices in libata.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c index d14a48e75f1..89aaf749cd1 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c @@ -561,6 +561,13 @@ int ata_acpi_exec_tfs(struct ata_port *ap) if (noacpi) return 0; + /* + * TBD - implement PATA support. For now, + * we should not run GTF on PATA devices since some + * PATA require execution of GTM/STM before GTF. + */ + if (!(ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA)) + return 0; for (ix = 0; ix < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; ix++) { if (!ata_dev_enabled(&ap->device[ix])) |