[PATCH] relayfs

Here's the latest version of relayfs, against linux-2.6.11-mm2.  I'm hoping
you'll consider putting this version back into your tree - the previous
rounds of comment seem to have shaken out all the API issues and the number
of comments on the code itself have also steadily dwindled.

This patch is essentially the same as the relayfs redux part 5 patch, with
some minor changes based on reviewer comments.  Thanks again to Pekka
Enberg for those.  The patch size without documentation is now a little
smaller at just over 40k.  Here's a detailed list of the changes:

- removed the attribute_flags in relay open and changed it to a
  boolean specifying either overwrite or no-overwrite mode, and removed
  everything referencing the attribute flags.
- added a check for NULL names in relayfs_create_entry()
- got rid of the unnecessary multiple labels in relay_create_buf()
- some minor simplification of relay_alloc_buf() which got rid of a
  couple params
- updated the Documentation

In addition, this version (through code contained in the relay-apps tarball
linked to below, not as part of the relayfs patch) tries to make it as easy
as possible to create the cooperating kernel/user pieces of a typical and
common type of logging application, one where kernel logging is kicked off
when a user space data collection app starts and stops when the collection
app exits, with the data being automatically logged to disk in between.  To
create this type of application, you basically just include a header file
(relay-app.h, included in the relay-apps tarball) in your kernel module,
define a couple of callbacks and call an initialization function, and on
the user side call a single function that sets up and continuously monitors
the buffers, and writes data to files as it becomes available.  Channels
are created when the collection app is started and destroyed when it exits,
not when the kernel module is inserted, so different channel buffer sizes
can be specified for each separate run via command-line options.  See the
README in the relay-apps tarball for details.

Also included in the relay-apps tarball are a couple examples
demonstrating how you can use this to create quick and dirty kernel
logging/debugging applications.  They are:

- tprintk, short for 'tee printk', which temporarily puts a kprobe on
  printk() and writes a duplicate stream of printk output to a relayfs
  channel.  This could be used anywhere there's printk() debugging code
  in the kernel which you'd like to exercise, but would rather not have
  your system logs cluttered with debugging junk.  You'd probably want
  to kill klogd while you do this, otherwise there wouldn't be much
  point (since putting a kprobe on printk() doesn't change the output
  of printk()).  I've used this method to temporarily divert the packet
  logging output of the iptables LOG target from the system logs to
  relayfs files instead, for instance.

- klog, which just provides a printk-like formatted logging function
  on top of relayfs.  Again, you can use this to keep stuff out of your
  system logs if used in place of printk.

The example applications can be found here:

http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/dprobes/relay-apps.tar.gz?download

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  avoid lookup_hash usage in relayfs

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 362 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/relayfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/relayfs.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d24e1b0d4f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/relayfs.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
+
+relayfs - a high-speed data relay filesystem
+============================================
+
+relayfs is a filesystem designed to provide an efficient mechanism for
+tools and facilities to relay large and potentially sustained streams
+of data from kernel space to user space.
+
+The main abstraction of relayfs is the 'channel'.  A channel consists
+of a set of per-cpu kernel buffers each represented by a file in the
+relayfs filesystem.  Kernel clients write into a channel using
+efficient write functions which automatically log to the current cpu's
+channel buffer.  User space applications mmap() the per-cpu files and
+retrieve the data as it becomes available.
+
+The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely
+up to the relayfs client; relayfs does however provide hooks which
+allow clients to impose some stucture on the buffer data.  Nor does
+relayfs implement any form of data filtering - this also is left to
+the client.  The purpose is to keep relayfs as simple as possible.
+
+This document provides an overview of the relayfs API.  The details of
+the function parameters are documented along with the functions in the
+filesystem code - please see that for details.
+
+Semantics
+=========
+
+Each relayfs channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or
+more sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until
+it is too full to contain a new message, in which case it it is
+written to the next (if available).  Messages are never split across
+sub-buffers.  At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties
+the first sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next.
+
+When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many
+bytes of it are padding i.e. unused.  Userspace can use this knowledge
+to copy only valid data.
+
+After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer
+has been consumed.
+
+relayfs can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not yet
+collected by userspace, and not wait for it to consume it.
+
+relayfs itself does not provide for communication of such data between
+userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain simple and not
+impose a single interface on userspace. It does provide a separate
+helper though, described below.
+
+klog, relay-app & librelay
+==========================
+
+relayfs itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, two
+additional systems are provided.  klog is a simple wrapper to make
+writing formatted text or raw data to a channel simpler, regardless of
+whether a channel to write into exists or not, or whether relayfs is
+compiled into the kernel or is configured as a module.  relay-app is
+the kernel counterpart of userspace librelay.c, combined these two
+files provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without having to
+bother with housekeeping.  klog and relay-app can be used together,
+with klog providing high-level logging functions to the kernel and
+relay-app taking care of kernel-user control and disk-logging chores.
+
+It is possible to use relayfs without relay-app & librelay, but you'll
+have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, allowing
+both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of padding).
+
+klog, relay-app and librelay can be found in the relay-apps tarball on
+http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
+
+The relayfs user space API
+==========================
+
+relayfs implements basic file operations for user space access to
+relayfs channel buffer data.  Here are the file operations that are
+available and some comments regarding their behavior:
+
+open()	 enables user to open an _existing_ buffer.
+
+mmap()	 results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's
+	 memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you must
+	 map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE.
+
+read()	 read the contents of a channel buffer.  The bytes read are
+	 'consumed' by the reader i.e. they won't be available again
+	 to subsequent reads.  If the channel is being used in
+	 no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any time
+	 even if there's an active kernel writer.  If the channel is
+	 being used in overwrite mode and there are active channel
+	 writers, results may be unpredictable - users should make
+	 sure that all logging to the channel has ended before using
+	 read() with overwrite mode.
+
+poll()	 POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported.  User applications are
+	 notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed.
+
+close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount.  When the refcount
+	reaches 0 i.e. when no process or kernel client has the buffer
+	open, the channel buffer is freed.
+
+
+In order for a user application to make use of relayfs files, the
+relayfs filesystem must be mounted.  For example,
+
+	mount -t relayfs relayfs /mnt/relay
+
+NOTE:	relayfs doesn't need to be mounted for kernel clients to create
+	or use channels - it only needs to be mounted when user space
+	applications need access to the buffer data.
+
+
+The relayfs kernel API
+======================
+
+Here's a summary of the API relayfs provides to in-kernel clients:
+
+
+  channel management functions:
+
+    relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs,
+               callbacks)
+    relay_close(chan)
+    relay_flush(chan)
+    relay_reset(chan)
+    relayfs_create_dir(name, parent)
+    relayfs_remove_dir(dentry)
+
+  channel management typically called on instigation of userspace:
+
+    relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed)
+
+  write functions:
+
+    relay_write(chan, data, length)
+    __relay_write(chan, data, length)
+    relay_reserve(chan, length)
+
+  callbacks:
+
+    subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding)
+    buf_mapped(buf, filp)
+    buf_unmapped(buf, filp)
+
+  helper functions:
+
+    relay_buf_full(buf)
+    subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length)
+
+
+Creating a channel
+------------------
+
+relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu
+channel buffers.  Each channel buffer will have an associated file
+created for it in the relayfs filesystem, which can be opened and
+mmapped from user space if desired.  The files are named
+basename0...basenameN-1 where N is the number of online cpus, and by
+default will be created in the root of the filesystem.  If you want a
+directory structure to contain your relayfs files, you can create it
+with relayfs_create_dir() and pass the parent directory to
+relay_open().  Clients are responsible for cleaning up any directory
+structure they create when the channel is closed - use
+relayfs_remove_dir() for that.
+
+The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the
+number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open().
+The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of
+double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to
+easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can
+be important for some high-volume applications.  The number and size
+of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for
+the same application, different conditions will warrant different
+values for these parameters at different times.  Typically, the right
+values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general,
+though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad
+idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events
+depending on the channel mode being used.
+
+Channel 'modes'
+---------------
+
+relayfs channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or
+'no-overwrite'.  The mode is entirely determined by the implementation
+of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below.  In 'overwrite'
+mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes continuously cycle
+around the buffer and will never fail, but will unconditionally
+overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually been consumed.
+In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail i.e. data will be lost, if the
+number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total number of
+sub-buffers in the channel.  It should be clear that if there is no
+consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast enought,
+data will be lost in either case; the only difference is whether data
+is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer.
+
+As explained above, a relayfs channel is made of up one or more
+per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer
+subdivided into one or more sub-buffers.  Messages are written into
+the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the
+write functions described below.  Whenever a message can't fit into
+the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the
+client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a
+new sub-buffer is about to occur.  The client uses this callback to 1)
+initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous
+sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating
+whether or not to actually go ahead with the sub-buffer switch.
+
+To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide
+an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the
+following:
+
+static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
+                        void *subbuf,
+			void *prev_subbuf,
+			unsigned int prev_padding)
+{
+	if (prev_subbuf)
+		*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
+
+	if (relay_buf_full(buf))
+		return 0;
+
+	subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+If the current buffer is full i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed,
+the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not
+occur yet i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the current
+set of ready sub-buffers.  For the relay_buf_full() function to make
+sense, the consumer is reponsible for notifying relayfs when
+sub-buffers have been consumed via relay_subbufs_consumed().  Any
+subsequent attempts to write into the buffer will again invoke the
+subbuf_start() callback with the same parameters; only when the
+consumer has consumed one or more of the ready sub-buffers will
+relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the buffer switch can
+continue.
+
+The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode
+would be very similar:
+
+static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
+                        void *subbuf,
+			void *prev_subbuf,
+			unsigned int prev_padding)
+{
+	if (prev_subbuf)
+		*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
+
+	subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the
+callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur
+unconditionally.  It's also meaningless for the client to use the
+relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never
+consulted.
+
+The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't
+define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback,
+implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode i.e. it does
+nothing but return 0.
+
+Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer
+by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the
+subbuf_start() callback.  This reserved area can be used to store
+whatever information the client wants.  In the example above, room is
+reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that
+sub-buffer.  This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the
+subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous
+sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a
+pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't
+known until a sub-buffer is filled.  The subbuf_start() callback is
+also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to
+give the client a chance to reserve space in it.  In this case the
+previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so
+the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before
+writing into the previous sub-buffer.
+
+Writing to a channel
+--------------------
+
+kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using
+relay_write() or __relay_write().  relay_write() is the main logging
+function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be
+used if you might be logging from interrupt context.  If you know
+you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use
+__relay_write(), which only disables preemption.  These functions
+don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they
+failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return
+value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed
+unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in
+which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start()
+callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function.
+
+relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which
+can be written to later.  This would typically be used in applications
+that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to
+stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand.  Because the actual write
+may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications
+using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually
+written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as
+a separate array.  See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball
+at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be
+done.  Because the write is under control of the client and is
+separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer
+at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate
+synchronization when using relay_reserve().
+
+Closing a channel
+-----------------
+
+The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel.
+The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no
+longer any references to any of the channel buffers.  relay_flush()
+forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used
+to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is
+closed.
+
+Misc
+----
+
+Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it
+rather than open and close a new channel for each use.  relay_reset()
+can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial
+state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying
+existing mappings.  It should however only be called when it's safe to
+do so i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to.
+
+Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for
+different purposes.  buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer
+is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's
+unmapped.  The client can use this notification to trigger actions
+within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to
+the channel.
+
+
+Resources
+=========
+
+For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relayfs homepage:
+
+    http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
+
+
+Credits
+=======
+
+The ideas and specs for relayfs came about as a result of discussions
+on tracing involving the following:
+
+Michel Dagenais		<michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>
+Richard Moore		<richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
+Bob Wisniewski		<bob@watson.ibm.com>
+Karim Yaghmour		<karim@opersys.com>
+Tom Zanussi		<zanussi@us.ibm.com>
+
+Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug
+reports.