diff options
author | Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> | 2009-09-03 20:14:05 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | paul <paul@twilight.(none)> | 2009-09-03 20:14:05 +0300 |
commit | b04b65ab5b4fc86af073424af6295be4e067adf3 (patch) | |
tree | 085329ff5321e1749883afd9c5186590232b75cf /arch/arm/plat-omap/include | |
parent | 02bfc030e4417003b7a94393102c92e39b2dfa65 (diff) |
OMAP2/3/4 core: create omap_device layer
The omap_device code provides a mapping of omap_hwmod structures into
the platform_device system, and includes some details on external
(board-level) integration. This allows drivers to enable, idle, and
shutdown on-chip device resources, including clocks, regulators, etc.
The resources enabled and idled are dependent on the device's maximum
wakeup latency constraint (if present).
At the moment, omap_device functions are intended to be called from
platform_data function pointers. Ideally in the future these
functions will be called from either subarchitecture-specific
platform_data activate, deactivate functions, or via an custom
bus/device type for OMAP.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Cc: Sakari Poussa <sakari.poussa@nokia.com>
Cc: Anand Sawant <sawant@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Eric Thomas <ethomas@ti.com>
Cc: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/plat-omap/include')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap_device.h | 141 |
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap_device.h new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bd0e136db33 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap_device.h @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +/* + * omap_device headers + * + * Copyright (C) 2009 Nokia Corporation + * Paul Walmsley + * + * Developed in collaboration with (alphabetical order): Benoit + * Cousson, Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren, Rajendra Nayak, Vikram + * Pandita, Sakari Poussa, Anand Sawant, Santosh Shilimkar, Richard + * Woodruff + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * Eventually this type of functionality should either be + * a) implemented via arch-specific pointers in platform_device + * or + * b) implemented as a proper omap_bus/omap_device in Linux, no more + * platform_device + * + * omap_device differs from omap_hwmod in that it includes external + * (e.g., board- and system-level) integration details. omap_hwmod + * stores hardware data that is invariant for a given OMAP chip. + * + * To do: + * - GPIO integration + * - regulator integration + * + */ +#ifndef __ARCH_ARM_PLAT_OMAP_INCLUDE_MACH_OMAP_DEVICE_H +#define __ARCH_ARM_PLAT_OMAP_INCLUDE_MACH_OMAP_DEVICE_H + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +#include <mach/omap_hwmod.h> + +/* omap_device._state values */ +#define OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_UNKNOWN 0 +#define OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_ENABLED 1 +#define OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_IDLE 2 +#define OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_SHUTDOWN 3 + +/** + * struct omap_device - omap_device wrapper for platform_devices + * @pdev: platform_device + * @hwmods: (one .. many per omap_device) + * @hwmods_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of @hwmods + * @pm_lats: ptr to an omap_device_pm_latency table + * @pm_lats_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of what is passed to @pm_lats + * @pm_lat_level: array index of the last odpl entry executed - -1 if never + * @dev_wakeup_lat: dev wakeup latency in microseconds + * @_dev_wakeup_lat_limit: dev wakeup latency limit in usec - set by OMAP PM + * @_state: one of OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_* (see above) + * @flags: device flags + * + * Integrates omap_hwmod data into Linux platform_device. + * + * Field names beginning with underscores are for the internal use of + * the omap_device code. + * + */ +struct omap_device { + struct platform_device pdev; + struct omap_hwmod **hwmods; + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats; + u32 dev_wakeup_lat; + u32 _dev_wakeup_lat_limit; + u8 pm_lats_cnt; + s8 pm_lat_level; + u8 hwmods_cnt; + u8 _state; +}; + +/* Device driver interface (call via platform_data fn ptrs) */ + +int omap_device_enable(struct platform_device *pdev); +int omap_device_idle(struct platform_device *pdev); +int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev); + +/* Core code interface */ + +int omap_device_count_resources(struct omap_device *od); +int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, struct resource *res); + +struct omap_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, + int pdata_len, + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, + int pm_lats_cnt); + +struct omap_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, + struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, + void *pdata, int pdata_len, + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, + int pm_lats_cnt); + +int omap_device_register(struct omap_device *od); + +/* OMAP PM interface */ +int omap_device_align_pm_lat(struct platform_device *pdev, + u32 new_wakeup_lat_limit); +struct powerdomain *omap_device_get_pwrdm(struct omap_device *od); + +/* Other */ + +int omap_device_idle_hwmods(struct omap_device *od); +int omap_device_enable_hwmods(struct omap_device *od); + +int omap_device_disable_clocks(struct omap_device *od); +int omap_device_enable_clocks(struct omap_device *od); + + +/* + * Entries should be kept in latency order ascending + * + * deact_lat is the maximum number of microseconds required to complete + * deactivate_func() at the device's slowest OPP. + * + * act_lat is the maximum number of microseconds required to complete + * activate_func() at the device's slowest OPP. + * + * This will result in some suboptimal power management decisions at fast + * OPPs, but avoids having to recompute all device power management decisions + * if the system shifts from a fast OPP to a slow OPP (in order to meet + * latency requirements). + * + * XXX should deactivate_func/activate_func() take platform_device pointers + * rather than omap_device pointers? + */ +struct omap_device_pm_latency { + u32 deactivate_lat; + int (*deactivate_func)(struct omap_device *od); + u32 activate_lat; + int (*activate_func)(struct omap_device *od); +}; + + +#endif + |