aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/blackfin/include/asm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>2009-06-08 18:11:21 -0400
committerMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>2009-06-13 07:20:14 -0400
commite38eb89210ce7171291e4164c24b8d1e6c5385ea (patch)
tree3ce36bb9be39634ee781f08d4e66328bcc33ed25 /arch/blackfin/include/asm
parent8f86001f76609f70bfcce34e7e2a11860e012ace (diff)
Blackfin: punt unused/wrong mutex-dec.h
Looks like the mutex-dec.h header file was incorrectly copied into the Blackfin asm path. Nothing uses it, so punt it. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/blackfin/include/asm')
-rw-r--r--arch/blackfin/include/asm/mutex-dec.h112
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/include/asm/mutex-dec.h b/arch/blackfin/include/asm/mutex-dec.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 0134151656a..00000000000
--- a/arch/blackfin/include/asm/mutex-dec.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,112 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
- *
- * Generic implementation of the mutex fastpath, based on atomic
- * decrement/increment.
- */
-#ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_MUTEX_DEC_H
-#define _ASM_GENERIC_MUTEX_DEC_H
-
-/**
- * __mutex_fastpath_lock - try to take the lock by moving the count
- * from 1 to a 0 value
- * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @fail_fn: function to call if the original value was not 1
- *
- * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and call <fail_fn> if
- * it wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than
- * 1 even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
- */
-static inline void
-__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
- if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
- fail_fn(count);
- else
- smp_mb();
-}
-
-/**
- * __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
- * from 1 to a 0 value
- * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @fail_fn: function to call if the original value was not 1
- *
- * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and call <fail_fn> if
- * it wasn't 1 originally. This function returns 0 if the fastpath succeeds,
- * or anything the slow path function returns.
- */
-static inline int
-__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, fastcall int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
- if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
- return fail_fn(count);
- else {
- smp_mb();
- return 0;
- }
-}
-
-/**
- * __mutex_fastpath_unlock - try to promote the count from 0 to 1
- * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @fail_fn: function to call if the original value was not 0
- *
- * Try to promote the count from 0 to 1. If it wasn't 0, call <fail_fn>.
- * In the failure case, this function is allowed to either set the value to
- * 1, or to set it to a value lower than 1.
- *
- * If the implementation sets it to a value of lower than 1, then the
- * __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
- * to return 0 otherwise.
- */
-static inline void
-__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
- smp_mb();
- if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0))
- fail_fn(count);
-}
-
-#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 1
-
-/**
- * __mutex_fastpath_trylock - try to acquire the mutex, without waiting
- *
- * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @fail_fn: fallback function
- *
- * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and return 0 (failure)
- * if it wasn't 1 originally, or return 1 (success) otherwise. This function
- * MUST leave the value lower than 1 even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
- * Additionally, if the value was < 0 originally, this function must not leave
- * it to 0 on failure.
- *
- * If the architecture has no effective trylock variant, it should call the
- * <fail_fn> spinlock-based trylock variant unconditionally.
- */
-static inline int
-__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
-{
- /*
- * We have two variants here. The cmpxchg based one is the best one
- * because it never induce a false contention state. It is included
- * here because architectures using the inc/dec algorithms over the
- * xchg ones are much more likely to support cmpxchg natively.
- *
- * If not we fall back to the spinlock based variant - that is
- * just as efficient (and simpler) as a 'destructive' probing of
- * the mutex state would be.
- */
-#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
- if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1)) {
- smp_mb();
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
-#else
- return fail_fn(count);
-#endif
-}
-
-#endif