[PATCH] x86-64: Support dualcore and 8 socket systems in k8 fallback node parsing

In particular on systems where the local APIC space and node space
is very different from the Linux CPU number space.

Previously the older NUMA setup code directly parsing the K8
northbridge registers had some issues on 8 socket or dual core
systems. This patch fixes them.

This is mainly done by fixing some confusion between Linux
CPU numbers and local APIC ids. We now pass the local APIC IDs
to later code, which avoids mismatches.

Also add some heuristics to detect cases where the Hypertransport
nodeids and the local APIC IDs don't match, but are shifted
by a constant offset.

This is still all quite hackish, hopefully BIOS writers fill
in correct SRATs instead.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
index 976ebcf96f3..df55a63f886 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -755,6 +755,24 @@ static void __cpuinit display_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+static int nearby_node(int apicid)
+{
+	int i;
+	for (i = apicid - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		int node = apicid_to_node[i];
+		if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
+			return node;
+	}
+	for (i = apicid + 1; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) {
+		int node = apicid_to_node[i];
+		if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
+			return node;
+	}
+	return first_node(node_online_map); /* Shouldn't happen */
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * On a AMD dual core setup the lower bits of the APIC id distingush the cores.
  * Assumes number of cores is a power of two.
@@ -763,9 +781,11 @@ static void __init amd_detect_cmp(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	int node = 0;
 	unsigned bits;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	int node = 0;
 	unsigned apicid = phys_proc_id[cpu];
+#endif
 
 	bits = 0;
 	while ((1 << bits) < c->x86_num_cores)
@@ -777,24 +797,32 @@ static void __init amd_detect_cmp(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	phys_proc_id[cpu] >>= bits;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	/* When an ACPI SRAT table is available use the mappings from SRAT
-	   instead. */
-	node = phys_proc_id[cpu];
-	if (acpi_numa > 0) {
-		if (apicid_to_node[apicid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			node = apicid_to_node[apicid];
-		else
-			printk(KERN_ERR
-			       "SRAT: Didn't specify node for CPU %d(%d)\n",
-			       cpu, apicid);
-	}
-	if (!node_online(node))
-		node = first_node(node_online_map);
-	cpu_to_node[cpu] = node;
+  	node = phys_proc_id[cpu];
+ 	if (apicid_to_node[apicid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ 		node = apicid_to_node[apicid];
+ 	if (!node_online(node)) {
+ 		/* Two possibilities here:
+ 		   - The CPU is missing memory and no node was created.
+ 		   In that case try picking one from a nearby CPU
+ 		   - The APIC IDs differ from the HyperTransport node IDs
+ 		   which the K8 northbridge parsing fills in.
+ 		   Assume they are all increased by a constant offset,
+ 		   but in the same order as the HT nodeids.
+ 		   If that doesn't result in a usable node fall back to the
+ 		   path for the previous case.  */
+ 		int ht_nodeid = apicid - (phys_proc_id[0] << bits);
+ 		if (ht_nodeid >= 0 &&
+ 		    apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ 			node = apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid];
+ 		/* Pick a nearby node */
+ 		if (!node_online(node))
+ 			node = nearby_node(apicid);
+ 	}
+  	cpu_to_node[cpu] = node;
+
+  	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d(%d) -> Node %d -> Core %d\n",
+  			cpu, c->x86_num_cores, node, cpu_core_id[cpu]);
 #endif
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d(%d) -> Node %d -> Core %d\n",
-			cpu, c->x86_num_cores, node, cpu_core_id[cpu]);
 #endif
 }