diff options
| author | David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> | 2006-12-13 00:35:08 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-12-13 09:05:52 -0800 |
| commit | a2db8dfce8d94fecae50128d912fec7980687a51 (patch) | |
| tree | 0670b0d16e3282967dabb073cad6a7e3342812f5 /drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | |
| parent | 5a6534e4cf53e16a6ea92f033f89d6575b3d7422 (diff) | |
[PATCH] rtc framewok: rtc_wkalrm.enabled reporting updates
Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: use
the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) of
"alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc code, which
originated that reporting API).
Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate status,
and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. We really don't
want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c index 91a43c970b2..c272afd6217 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset) seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday); else seq_printf(seq, "**\n"); - seq_printf(seq, "alrm_wakeup\t: %s\n", + seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n", alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no"); seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n", alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no"); |