diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2009-10-28 20:26:48 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2009-10-28 20:34:34 +0100 |
commit | 11df6dddcbc38affb7473aad3d962baf8414a947 (patch) | |
tree | fb05ef2583a55e69897988491522b92137ca5f26 /firmware/sb16 | |
parent | 89061d3d58e1f0742139605dc6a7950aa1ecc019 (diff) |
futex: Fix spurious wakeup for requeue_pi really
The requeue_pi path doesn't use unqueue_me() (and the racy lock_ptr ==
NULL test) nor does it use the wake_list of futex_wake() which where
the reason for commit 41890f2 (futex: Handle spurious wake up)
See debugging discussing on LKML Message-ID: <4AD4080C.20703@us.ibm.com>
The changes in this fix to the wait_requeue_pi path were considered to
be a likely unecessary, but harmless safety net. But it turns out that
due to the fact that for unknown $@#!*( reasons EWOULDBLOCK is defined
as EAGAIN we built an endless loop in the code path which returns
correctly EWOULDBLOCK.
Spurious wakeups in wait_requeue_pi code path are unlikely so we do
the easy solution and return EWOULDBLOCK^WEAGAIN to user space and let
it deal with the spurious wakeup.
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4AE23C74.1090502@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'firmware/sb16')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions