diff options
author | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> | 2007-10-09 13:30:57 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> | 2007-10-10 16:55:02 -0700 |
commit | 68325d3b12ad5bce650c2883bb878257f197efff (patch) | |
tree | c6d15e03e017599b07742d0a8453e4ee8ee253e3 /fs/bad_inode.c | |
parent | 658b219e9379d75fbdc578b9630b598098471258 (diff) |
[XFRM] user: Move attribute copying code into copy_to_user_state_extra
Here's a good example of code duplication leading to code rot. The
notification patch did its own netlink message creation for xfrm states.
It duplicated code that was already in dump_one_state. Guess what, the
next time (and the time after) when someone updated dump_one_state the
notification path got zilch.
This patch moves that code from dump_one_state to copy_to_user_state_extra
and uses it in xfrm_notify_sa too. Unfortunately whoever updates this
still needs to update xfrm_sa_len since the notification path wants to
know the exact size for allocation.
At least I've added a comment saying so and if someone still forgest, we'll
have a WARN_ON telling us so.
I also changed the security size calculation to use xfrm_user_sec_ctx since
that's what we actually put into the skb. However it makes no practical
difference since it has the same size as xfrm_sec_ctx.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/bad_inode.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions