aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/cifs/transport.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>2009-09-21 06:47:50 -0400
committerSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>2009-09-24 18:33:18 +0000
commit3bc303c254335dbd7c7012cc1760b12f1d5514d3 (patch)
tree7da17fbfd697216d9ed0ccd64ea9c03aaf3d52c1 /fs/cifs/transport.c
parent48541bd3dd4739b4d574b44ea47660c88d833677 (diff)
cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility (try #4)
This is the fourth respin of the patch to convert oplock breaks to use the slow_work facility. A customer of ours was testing a backport of one of the earlier patchsets, and hit a "Busy inodes after umount..." problem. An oplock break job had raced with a umount, and the superblock got torn down and its memory reused. When the oplock break job tried to dereference the inode->i_sb, the kernel oopsed. This patchset has the oplock break job hold an inode and vfsmount reference until the oplock break completes. With this, there should be no need to take a tcon reference (the vfsmount implicitly holds one already). Currently, when an oplock break comes in there's a chance that the oplock break job won't occur if the allocation of the oplock_q_entry fails. There are also some rather nasty races in the allocation and handling these structs. Rather than allocating oplock queue entries when an oplock break comes in, add a few extra fields to the cifsFileInfo struct. Get rid of the dedicated cifs_oplock_thread as well and queue the oplock break job to the slow_work thread pool. This approach also has the advantage that the oplock break jobs can potentially run in parallel rather than be serialized like they are today. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/cifs/transport.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/cifs/transport.c50
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
index 1da4ab250ea..07b8e71544e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
@@ -103,56 +103,6 @@ DeleteMidQEntry(struct mid_q_entry *midEntry)
mempool_free(midEntry, cifs_mid_poolp);
}
-struct oplock_q_entry *
-AllocOplockQEntry(struct inode *pinode, __u16 fid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon)
-{
- struct oplock_q_entry *temp;
- if ((pinode == NULL) || (tcon == NULL)) {
- cERROR(1, ("Null parms passed to AllocOplockQEntry"));
- return NULL;
- }
- temp = (struct oplock_q_entry *) kmem_cache_alloc(cifs_oplock_cachep,
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (temp == NULL)
- return temp;
- else {
- temp->pinode = pinode;
- temp->tcon = tcon;
- temp->netfid = fid;
- spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
- list_add_tail(&temp->qhead, &cifs_oplock_list);
- spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
- }
- return temp;
-}
-
-void DeleteOplockQEntry(struct oplock_q_entry *oplockEntry)
-{
- spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
- /* should we check if list empty first? */
- list_del(&oplockEntry->qhead);
- spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
- kmem_cache_free(cifs_oplock_cachep, oplockEntry);
-}
-
-
-void DeleteTconOplockQEntries(struct cifsTconInfo *tcon)
-{
- struct oplock_q_entry *temp;
-
- if (tcon == NULL)
- return;
-
- spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(temp, &cifs_oplock_list, qhead) {
- if ((temp->tcon) && (temp->tcon == tcon)) {
- list_del(&temp->qhead);
- kmem_cache_free(cifs_oplock_cachep, temp);
- }
- }
- spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock);
-}
-
static int
smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec)
{