aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-blackfin
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>2008-02-09 00:10:12 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2008-02-09 11:08:33 -0800
commit880cdf3a8122288d37829ce01eadf8822bb386db (patch)
treee0fbac42ec81a071f2af2377cdcce0ce37ec152f /include/asm-blackfin
parentb1d0e4f535e10775cffde922208b49629169aeaa (diff)
Fix compile error on nommu for is_swap_pte
CC mm/vmscan.o In file included from /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/mm/vmscan.c:44: /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h: In function 'is_swap_pte': /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_none' /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_present' Does it ever make sense to ask "is this pte a swap entry?" on a machine with no MMU? Presumably this also means it has no ptes too, right? In which case, it's better to comment the whole function out. Then when someone tries to ask the above meaningless question, they get a compile error rather than a meaningless answer. Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Reported-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-blackfin')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions