diff options
author | Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> | 2008-12-31 15:11:38 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> | 2008-12-31 15:11:46 +0100 |
commit | 79741dd35713ff4f6fd0eafd59fa94e8a4ba922d (patch) | |
tree | 73c6b503fbd274cb3fcca7a0a68c6f636e3a53ad /kernel/time | |
parent | 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4 (diff) |
[PATCH] idle cputime accounting
The cpu time spent by the idle process actually doing something is
currently accounted as idle time. This is plain wrong, the architectures
that support VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y can do better: distinguish between the
time spent doing nothing and the time spent by idle doing work. The first
is accounted with account_idle_time and the second with account_system_time.
The architectures that use the account_xxx_time interface directly and not
the account_xxx_ticks interface now need to do the check for the idle
process in their arch code. In particular to improve the system vs true
idle time accounting the arch code needs to measure the true idle time
instead of just testing for the idle process.
To improve the tick based accounting as well we would need an architecture
primitive that can tell us if the pt_regs of the interrupted context
points to the magic instruction that halts the cpu.
In addition idle time is no more added to the stime of the idle process.
This field now contains the system time of the idle process as it should
be. On systems without VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING this will always be zero as
every tick that occurs while idle is running will be accounted as idle
time.
This patch contains the necessary common code changes to be able to
distinguish idle system time and true idle time. The architectures with
support for VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING need some changes to exploit this.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 1f2fce2479f..611fa4c0baa 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -419,8 +419,9 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void) { int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); +#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING unsigned long ticks; - cputime_t cputime; +#endif ktime_t now; local_irq_disable(); @@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void) tick_do_update_jiffies64(now); cpu_clear(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask); +#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING /* * We stopped the tick in idle. Update process times would miss the * time we slept as update_process_times does only a 1 tick @@ -451,12 +453,9 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void) /* * We might be one off. Do not randomly account a huge number of ticks! */ - if (ticks && ticks < LONG_MAX) { - add_preempt_count(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); - cputime = jiffies_to_cputime(ticks); - account_system_time(current, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, cputime, cputime); - sub_preempt_count(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); - } + if (ticks && ticks < LONG_MAX) + account_idle_ticks(ticks); +#endif touch_softlockup_watchdog(); /* |