diff options
| author | Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> | 2010-03-01 21:55:51 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> | 2010-03-01 10:18:32 -0800 |
| commit | 37b99dd5372cff42f83210c280f314f10f99138e (patch) | |
| tree | b5fd741c214f308373232c26e82be9c7628c285c /kernel | |
| parent | dad52fc01161afcb8798c609e009aed4d104927f (diff) | |
resource: Fix generic page_is_ram() for partial RAM pages
The System RAM walk shall skip partial RAM pages and avoid calling
func() on them. So that page_is_ram() return 0 for a partial RAM page.
In particular, it shall not call func() with len=0.
This fixes a boot time bug reported by Sachin and root caused by Thomas:
> >>> WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:111 __ioremap_caller+0x169/0x2f1()
> >>> Hardware name: BladeCenter LS21 -[79716AA]-
> >>> Modules linked in:
> >>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.33-git6-autotest #1
> >>> Call Trace:
> >>> [<ffffffff81047cff>] ? __ioremap_caller+0x169/0x2f1
> >>> [<ffffffff81063b7d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa4
> >>> [<ffffffff81063bb9>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x11
> >>> [<ffffffff81047cff>] __ioremap_caller+0x169/0x2f1
> >>> [<ffffffff813747a3>] ? acpi_os_map_memory+0x12/0x1b
> >>> [<ffffffff81047f10>] ioremap_nocache+0x12/0x14
> >>> [<ffffffff813747a3>] acpi_os_map_memory+0x12/0x1b
> >>> [<ffffffff81282fa0>] acpi_tb_verify_table+0x29/0x5b
> >>> [<ffffffff812827f0>] acpi_load_tables+0x39/0x15a
> >>> [<ffffffff8191c8f8>] acpi_early_init+0x60/0xf5
> >>> [<ffffffff818f2cad>] start_kernel+0x397/0x3a7
> >>> [<ffffffff818f2295>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xa5/0xa9
> >>> [<ffffffff818f237a>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe1/0xe8
> >>> ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
> >>> ioremap reserve_memtype failed -22
The return code is -EINVAL, so it failed in the is_ram check, which is
not too surprising
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009c000 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 000000000009c000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cffa3900 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 00000000cffa3900 - 00000000cffa7400 (ACPI data)
The ACPI data is not starting on a page boundary and neither does the
usable RAM area end on a page boundary. Very useful !
> ACPI: DSDT 00000000cffa3900 036CE (v01 IBM SERLEWIS 00001000 INTL 20060912)
ACPI is trying to map DSDT at cffa3900, which results in a check
vs. cffa3000 which is the relevant page boundary. The generic is_ram
check correctly identifies that as RAM because it's in the usable
resource area. The old e820 based is_ram check does not take
overlapping resource areas into account. That's why it works.
CC: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100301135551.GA9998@localhost>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/resource.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index 03c897f7935..8f0e3d0f4bf 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg, int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *)) { struct resource res; - unsigned long pfn, len; + unsigned long pfn, end_pfn; u64 orig_end; int ret = -1; @@ -284,9 +284,10 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, orig_end = res.end; while ((res.start < res.end) && (find_next_system_ram(&res, "System RAM") >= 0)) { - pfn = (unsigned long)(res.start >> PAGE_SHIFT); - len = (unsigned long)((res.end + 1 - res.start) >> PAGE_SHIFT); - ret = (*func)(pfn, len, arg); + pfn = (res.start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + end_pfn = (res.end + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + if (end_pfn > pfn) + ret = (*func)(pfn, end_pfn - pfn, arg); if (ret) break; res.start = res.end + 1; |