aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/sctp/socket.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>2006-01-03 10:58:53 -0500
committerJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>2006-01-03 10:58:53 -0500
commita18ceba7b40e24a9da87249bd74f16ea5abd6894 (patch)
tree5ce615d345e720ddabf95c46fb62287ee763ad4e /net/sctp/socket.c
parentaaadff81195056c7c14e0d834b3318c624c0fd78 (diff)
parent88026842b0a760145aa71d69e74fbc9ec118ca44 (diff)
Merge branch 'master'
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sctp/socket.c')
-rw-r--r--net/sctp/socket.c14
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 1f7f244806b..9df888e932c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -156,10 +156,6 @@ static inline void sctp_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
- sk->sk_wmem_queued += SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
- sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
- sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
-
atomic_add(sizeof(struct sctp_chunk), &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
}
@@ -4426,7 +4422,7 @@ cleanup:
* tcp_poll(). Note that, based on these implementations, we don't
* lock the socket in this function, even though it seems that,
* ideally, locking or some other mechanisms can be used to ensure
- * the integrity of the counters (sndbuf and wmem_queued) used
+ * the integrity of the counters (sndbuf and wmem_alloc) used
* in this place. We assume that we don't need locks either until proven
* otherwise.
*
@@ -4833,10 +4829,6 @@ static void sctp_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
- sk->sk_wmem_queued -= SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
- sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
- sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
-
atomic_sub(sizeof(struct sctp_chunk), &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
sock_wfree(skb);
@@ -4920,7 +4912,7 @@ void sctp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
/* Is there any sndbuf space available on the socket?
*
- * Note that wmem_queued is the sum of the send buffers on all of the
+ * Note that sk_wmem_alloc is the sum of the send buffers on all of the
* associations on the same socket. For a UDP-style socket with
* multiple associations, it is possible for it to be "unwriteable"
* prematurely. I assume that this is acceptable because
@@ -4933,7 +4925,7 @@ static int sctp_writeable(struct sock *sk)
{
int amt = 0;
- amt = sk->sk_sndbuf - sk->sk_wmem_queued;
+ amt = sk->sk_sndbuf - atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
if (amt < 0)
amt = 0;
return amt;