aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h')
-rw-r--r--arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h17
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
index 120cfe4577c..fbac9d00744 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
@@ -13,17 +13,12 @@
* and rebuild your kernel.
*/
-/* All of these locking primitives are expected to work properly
- * even in an RMO memory model, which currently is what the kernel
- * runs in.
- *
- * There is another issue. Because we play games to save cycles
- * in the non-contention case, we need to be extra careful about
- * branch targets into the "spinning" code. They live in their
- * own section, but the newer V9 branches have a shorter range
- * than the traditional 32-bit sparc branch variants. The rule
- * is that the branches that go into and out of the spinner sections
- * must be pre-V9 branches.
+/* Because we play games to save cycles in the non-contention case, we
+ * need to be extra careful about branch targets into the "spinning"
+ * code. They live in their own section, but the newer V9 branches
+ * have a shorter range than the traditional 32-bit sparc branch
+ * variants. The rule is that the branches that go into and out of
+ * the spinner sections must be pre-V9 branches.
*/
#define __raw_spin_is_locked(lp) ((lp)->lock != 0)