| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The resume_mask wasn't being checked in vic_set_wake()
to see if the IRQ was a valid wakeup source.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
|
|
Add power management support to the VIC by registering
each VIC as a system device to get suspend/resume
events going.
Since the VIC registeration is done early, we need to
record the VICs in a static array which is used to add
the system devices later once the initcalls are run. This
means there is now a configuration value for the number
of VICs in the system.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
|
|
The VIC code will attempt to perform som
default set_irq_chip() and set_irq_chip_data()
on all IRQs supported by the VIC, while the new
IRQ handling code strictly checks for the global
NR_IRQS to be respected also for these IRQs.
This patch will respect the interrupt mask passed
to the VIC driver and will prevent it from
attempting to call these functions on any unused
interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
The original arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/vic.h was
written for the PL190 ARM VIC implementation, and as
such does not have any information about the PL192
version.
Add details about the PL192 and PL190 specific registers
and any changes between the two units.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
set_irq_chipdata -> set_irq_chip_data
get_irq_chipdata -> get_irq_chip_data
do_level_IRQ -> handle_level_irq
do_edge_IRQ -> handle_edge_irq
do_simple_IRQ -> handle_simple_irq
irqdesc -> irq_desc
irqchip -> irq_chip
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Patch from David Brownell
ARM genirq cleanups/updates:
- Start switching platforms to newer APIs
* use "irq_chip" name, not "irqchip"
* providing irq_chip.name
- Show irq_chip.name in /proc/interrupts, like on x86.
This update a bit more than half of the ARM code. The irq_chip.name
values were chosen to match docs (if I have them) or be otherwise
obvious ("FPGA", "CPLD", or matching the code).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Some SoCs have multiple VIC devices. Adapt the generic vic code
to allow multiple implementations to be handled.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Other machines may wish to make use of the VIC support code, so
move it to arch/arm/common.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
