| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently list of kretprobe instances are stored in kretprobe object (as
used_instances,free_instances) and in kretprobe hash table. We have one
global kretprobe lock to serialise the access to these lists. This causes
only one kretprobe handler to execute at a time. Hence affects system
performance, particularly on SMP systems and when return probe is set on
lot of functions (like on all systemcalls).
Solution proposed here gives fine-grain locks that performs better on SMP
system compared to present kretprobe implementation.
Solution:
1) Instead of having one global lock to protect kretprobe instances
present in kretprobe object and kretprobe hash table. We will have
two locks, one lock for protecting kretprobe hash table and another
lock for kretporbe object.
2) We hold lock present in kretprobe object while we modify kretprobe
instance in kretprobe object and we hold per-hash-list lock while
modifying kretprobe instances present in that hash list. To prevent
deadlock, we never grab a per-hash-list lock while holding a kretprobe
lock.
3) We can remove used_instances from struct kretprobe, as we can
track used instances of kretprobe instances using kretprobe hash
table.
Time duration for kernel compilation ("make -j 8") on a 8-way ppc64 system
with return probes set on all systemcalls looks like this.
cacheline non-cacheline Un-patched kernel
aligned patch aligned patch
===============================================================================
real 9m46.784s 9m54.412s 10m2.450s
user 40m5.715s 40m7.142s 40m4.273s
sys 2m57.754s 2m58.583s 3m17.430s
===========================================================
Time duration for kernel compilation ("make -j 8) on the same system, when
kernel is not probed.
=========================
real 9m26.389s
user 40m8.775s
sys 2m7.283s
=========================
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Follow suit from kprobe implementations on other archs and make kretprobe_trampoline non-static. Ftrace implmentation (more specifically, kernel/trace/trace.c) requires access to it (see-> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/5/27/1955234).
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
It is more useful to flush the cache with the actual buffer address
rather than the address containing a pointer to the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
The kprobes code is already able to cope with reentrant probes, so its
handler must be called outside of the region protected by undef_lock.
If ever this lock is released when handlers are called then this commit
could be reverted.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
|
|
This is a full implementation of Kprobes including Jprobes and
Kretprobes support.
This ARM implementation does not follow the usual kprobes double-
exception model. The traditional model is where the initial kprobes
breakpoint calls kprobe_handler(), which returns from exception to
execute the instruction in its original context, then immediately
re-enters after a second breakpoint (or single-stepping exception)
into post_kprobe_handler(), each time the probe is hit.. The ARM
implementation only executes one kprobes exception per hit, so no
post_kprobe_handler() phase. All side-effects from the kprobe'd
instruction are resolved before returning from the initial exception.
As a result, all instructions are _always_ effectively boosted
regardless of the type of instruction, and even regardless of whether
or not there is a post-handler for the probe.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Barnes <qbarnes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
|
