| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This broke sparc64 in various ways.
Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
To make this work we provide a dummy nop implementation
of of_fill_in_cpu_data() for sparc32.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.
This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This will be used in a subsequent changeset.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
All sparc64 specific, so only build this file on sparc64.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
A subsequent changeset will use this.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This is where common declarations will go as we unify
these files as much as possible into common code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
