aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-08-15x86: Fix UV BAU destination subnode idCliff Wickman
The SGI UV Broadcast Assist Unit is used to send TLB shootdown messages to remote nodes of the system. The header of the message must contain the subnode id of the block in the receiving hub that handles such messages. It should always be 0x10, the id of the "LB" block. It had previously been documented as a "must be zero" field. Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> Acked-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> LKML-Reference: <E1Mc1x7-0005Ce-6t@eag09.americas.sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-03x86: Fix UV BAU activation descriptor initCliff Wickman
The UV tlb shootdown code has a serious initialization error. An array of structures [32*8] is initialized as if it were [32]. The array is indexed by (cpu number on the blade)*8, so the short initialization works for up to 4 cpus on a blade. But above that, we provide an invalid opcode to the hub's broadcast assist unit. This patch changes the allocation of the array to use its symbolic dimensions for better clarity. And initializes all 32*8 entries. Shortened 'UV_ACTIVATION_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE' to 'UV_ADP_SIZE' per Ingo's recommendation. Tested on the UV simulator. Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <E1M6lZR-0007kV-Aq@eag09.americas.sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-21x86: uv cleanupTejun Heo
Impact: cleanup Make the following uv related cleanups. * collect visible uv related definitions and interfaces into uv/uv.h and use it. this cleans up the messy situation where on 64bit, uv is defined properly, on 32bit generic it's dummy and on the rest undefined. after this clean up, uv is defined on 64 and dummy on 32. * update uv_flush_tlb_others() such that it takes cpumask of to-be-flushed cpus as argument, instead of that minus self, and returns yet-to-be-flushed cpumask, instead of modifying the passed in parameter. this interface change will ease dummy implementation of uv_flush_tlb_others() and makes uv tlb flush related stuff defined in tlb_uv proper. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-01-11x86: change flush_tlb_others to take a const struct cpumaskRusty Russell
Impact: reduce stack usage, use new cpumask API. This is made a little more tricky by uv_flush_tlb_others which actually alters its argument, for an IPI to be sent to the remaining cpus in the mask. I solve this by allocating a cpumask_var_t for this case and falling back to IPI should this fail. To eliminate temporaries in the caller, all flush_tlb_others implementations now do the this-cpu-elimination step themselves. Note also the curious "cpus_or(f->flush_cpumask, cpumask, f->flush_cpumask)" which has been there since pre-git and yet f->flush_cpumask is always zero at this point. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
2008-12-30x86: uv_bau.h: fix dubious bitfieldJaswinder Singh Rajput
Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warnings declare bitfield as unsigned to avoid dubious bitfield issue CHECK arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield CHECK arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned' arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23x86: drop double underscores from header guardsH. Peter Anvin
Drop double underscores from header guards in arch/x86/include. They are used inconsistently, and are not necessary. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>