aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/sleep
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-09-21ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendumFrans Pop
Make the S0 state be always reported as supported Signed-off: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-09-20ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.Alexey Starikovskiy
Recent changes to sleep initialization in ACPI dropped reporting of supported Sx states above S3. Fix that and also move S5 init into same file as other Sx. The only functional change is adding printk() for S4 and S5 cases. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-08-28ACPI: (more) delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again)Christian Borntraeger
Commit 2bcf9dddeb8e79a4ba55bf191533f70f39ce ('ACPI: delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again)') was incomplete. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-08-25ACPI: "ACPI handle has no context!" should be KERN_DEBUGShaohua Li
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-29ACPI: restore CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEPLen Brown
Restore the 2.6.22 CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP build option, but now shadowing the new CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> [ Modified to work with the PM config setup changes. ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-29Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND for suspend-to-Ram and standbyRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND representing the ability to enter system sleep states, such as the ACPI S3 state, and allow the user to choose SUSPEND and HIBERNATION independently of each other. Make HOTPLUG_CPU be selected automatically if SUSPEND or HIBERNATION has been chosen and the kernel is intended for SMP systems. Also, introduce CONFIG_PM_SLEEP which is automatically selected if CONFIG_SUSPEND or CONFIG_HIBERNATION is set and use it to select the code needed for both suspend and hibernation. The top-level power management headers and the ACPI code related to suspend and hibernation are modified to use the new definitions (the changes in drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c are, mostly, moving code to reduce the number of ifdefs). There are many other files in which CONFIG_PM can be replaced with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or even with CONFIG_SUSPEND, but they can be updated in the future. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-29Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATIONRafael J. Wysocki
Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the next patch). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-25Pull d-states into release branchLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-25ACPI: Kconfig: remove CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP from sourceLen Brown
As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86), the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth. For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future S3 or S4 support. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-24ACPI: Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2 from acpi_pm_enterRafael J. Wysocki
Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2, introduced by acpi-implement-the-set_target-callback-from-pm_ops.patch, from acpi_pm_enter(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-24ACPI: Kconfig: fold /proc/acpi/sleep under CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFSLen Brown
/proc/acpi/sleep has had its own "default n" option, ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP, for many months. Time to delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP. Users that still need /proc/acpi/sleep can still get it along with the other deprecated /proc/acpi files by enabling CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS. Also delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS, which was an umbrella for /proc/acpi/sleep, wakeup, alarm, because it was effectively just a synonym for ACPI_SLEEP. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22ACPI: Add acpi_pm_device_sleep_state helper routineShaohua Li
Based on the David Brownell's patch at http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=117873972806360&w=2 updated by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Add a helper routine returning the lowest power (highest number) ACPI device power state that given device can be in while the system is in the sleep state indicated by acpi_target_sleep_state . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22ACPI: Implement the set_target() callback from pm_opsRafael J. Wysocki
In the future some drivers may need to use ACPI to determine the low power states in which to place their devices, but to provide the drivers with this information the ACPI core needs to know what sleep state the system is going to enter. Namely, the device's state should not be too high power for given system sleep state and, if the device is supposed to be able to wake up the system, its state should not be too low power for the wake up to be possible). For this purpose, the ACPI core needs to implement the set_target() method in 'struct pm_ops' and store the target system sleep state passed by the PM core in a variable. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-22Pull misc into release branchLen Brown
Conflicts: Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
2007-07-19PM: Introduce pm_power_off_prepareRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI). This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by pm_power_off() registered in a much different way. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-19ACPI: Do not prepare for hibernation in acpi_shutdownRafael J. Wysocki
Since we are now explicitly calling hibernation_ops->prepare() before hibernation_ops->enter() in hibernation_platform_enter() (defined in kernel/power/disk.c), ACPI should not call acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4) from acpi_shutdown(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-19swsusp: introduce restore platform operationsRafael J. Wysocki
At least on some machines it is necessary to prepare the ACPI firmware for the restoration of the system memory state from the hibernation image if the "platform" mode of hibernation has been used. Namely, in that cases we need to disable the GPEs before replacing the "boot" kernel with the "frozen" kernel (cf. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887). After the restore they will be re-enabled by hibernation_ops->finish(), but if the restore fails, they have to be re-enabled by the restore code explicitly. For this purpose we can introduce two additional hibernation operations, called pre_restore() and restore_cleanup() and call them from the restore code path. Still, they should be called if the "platform" mode of hibernation has been used, so we need to pass the information about the hibernation mode from the "frozen" kernel to the "boot" kernel in the image header. Apparently, we can't drop the disabling of GPEs before the restore because of Bug #7887 .  We also can't do it unconditionally, because the GPEs wouldn't have been enabled after a successful restore if the suspend had been done in the 'shutdown' or 'reboot' mode. In principle we could (and probably should) unconditionally disable the GPEs before each snapshot creation *and* before the restore, but then we'd have to unconditionally enable them after the snapshot creation as well as after the restore (or restore failure)   Still, for this purpose we'd need to modify acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep() and acpi_leave_sleep_state() and we'd have to introduce some mechanism synchronizing the disablind/enabling of the GPEs with the device drivers' .suspend()/.resume() routines and with disable_/enable_nonboot_cpus().  However, this would have affected the suspend (ie. s2ram) code as well as the hibernation, which I'd like to avoid in this patch series. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-03ACPI: suspend: delete toshiba S1 quirkPavel Machek
If we have quirk "init... after standby", we should not be calling it while resuming from hibernation. And... that quirk is only ever needed on toshiba 4030cdt... and... noone should be using standby these days, anyway. That quirk was certainly _not_ meant to be ran after hibernation. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-05-09ACPICA: LindentLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-05-09PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend codeRafael J. Wysocki
[ With Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> ] Separate the hibernation (aka suspend to disk code) from the other suspend code. In particular: * Remove the definitions related to hibernation from include/linux/pm.h * Introduce struct hibernation_ops and a new hibernate() function to hibernate the system, defined in include/linux/suspend.h * Separate suspend code in kernel/power/main.c from hibernation-related code in kernel/power/disk.c and kernel/power/user.c (with the help of hibernation_ops) * Switch ACPI (the only user of pm_ops.pm_disk_mode) to hibernation_ops Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08ACPI wakeup hooks for rtc-cmosDavid Brownell
Remove /proc/acpi/alarm file when the rtc-cmos "wakealarm" file is available. Instead, provide hooks that rtc-cmos will use. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07remove software_suspend()Johannes Berg
Remove software_suspend() and all its users since pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_DISK) should be equivalent and there's no point in having two interfaces for the same thing. The patch also changes the valid_state function to return 0 (false) for PM_SUSPEND_DISK when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not configured instead of accepting it and having the whole thing fail later. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-30power management: implement pm_ops.valid for everybodyJohannes Berg
Almost all users of pm_ops only support mem sleep, don't check in .valid and don't reject any others in .prepare so users can be confused if they check /sys/power/state, especially when new states are added (these would then result in s-t-r although they're supposed to be something different). This patch implements a generic pm_valid_only_mem function that is then exported for users and puts it to use in almost all existing pm_ops. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-25ACPI: make /proc/acpi/wakeup more usefulDavid Brownell
This updates /proc/acpi/wakeup to be more informative, primarily by showing the sysfs node associated with each wakeup-enabled device. Example: Device S-state Status Sysfs node PCI0 S4 disabled no-bus:pci0000:00 PS2M S4 disabled pnp:00:05 PS2K S4 disabled pnp:00:06 UAR1 S4 disabled pnp:00:08 USB1 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.0 USB2 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.1 USB3 S3 disabled USB4 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.3 S139 S4 disabled LAN S4 disabled pci:0000:00:04.0 MDM S4 disabled AUD S4 disabled pci:0000:00:02.7 SLPB S4 *enabled Eventually this file should be removed, but until then it's almost the only way we have to tell how the relevant ACPI tables are broken (and cope). In that example, two devices don't actually exist (USB3, S139), one can't issue wakeup events (PCI0), and two seem harmlessly (?) confused (MDM and AUD are the same PCI device, but it's the _modem_ that does wake-on-ring). In particular, we need to be sure driver model nodes are properly hooked up before we can get rid of this ACPI-only interface for wakeup events. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-16Pull bugzilla-7887 into release branchLen Brown
2007-02-14[PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.hTim Schmielau
After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes. There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need anything defined in there. Presumably these includes were once needed for macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the course of cleaning it up. To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble. Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all configs in arch/arm/configs on arm. I also checked that no new warnings were introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted by unnecessarily included header files). Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-10ACPI: invoke acpi_sleep_init() earlierAlexey Starikovskiy
late_initcall() is too late for acpi_sleep_init(). Call it directly from acpi_init code. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Lebedev <vladimir.p.lebedev@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-02ACPICA: minimal patch to integrate new tables into LinuxAlexey Starikovskiy
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-11-06ACPI: update commentSatoru Takeuchi
Fixing wrong description for acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(). acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() had only used on power off and was changed to also used on entering some sleep state. However its description isn't changed yet. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-07-10ACPI: add 'const' to several ACPI file_operationsArjan van de Ven
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-06-15Pull button into release branchLen Brown
2006-06-15ACPI: suppress power button event on S3 resumeArnaud Patard
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6612 Note that this fix depends on a fix in ACPICA 20060608 to replace a semaphore with a spin-lock. Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <apatard@mandriva.com> Acked-by: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-04-03ACPI: Don't print internal BIOS names of wakeup devicesBjorn Helgaas
Internal BIOS names like these should be exposed to the user as little as possible: ACPI wakeup devices: C069 C0CE C1D1 C0DE C1D4 Eventually, the "wakeup" property of a device should be exported via the device tree, not by a printk of an internal BIOS name. For the hard-core, these are still available in /proc/acpi/wakeup_devices, just not printed to dmesg. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-12-15[ACPI] fix reboot upon suspend-to-diskAlexey Starikovskiy
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4320 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-10-30[PATCH] introduce .valid callback for pm_opsShaohua Li
Add pm_ops.valid callback, so only the available pm states show in /sys/power/state. And this also makes an earlier states error report at enter_state before we do actual suspend/resume. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek<pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-10[PATCH] remove ACPI S4bios supportPavel Machek
Remove S4BIOS support. It is pretty useless, and only ever worked for _me_ once. (I do not think anyone else ever tried it). It was in feature-removal for a long time, and it should have been removed before. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-29Auto-update from upstreamLen Brown
2005-08-27[PATCH] acpi_shutdown: Only prepare for power off on power_offEric W. Biederman
When acpi_sleep_prepare was moved into a shutdown method we started calling it for all shutdowns. It appears this triggers some systems to power off on reboot. Avoid this by only calling acpi_sleep_prepare if we are going to power off the system. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-05[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI filesLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-08-05[ACPI] whitespacePavel Machek
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-07-26[PATCH] acpi: Don't call acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_offEric W. Biederman
Now that all of the code paths that call acpi_power_off have been modified to call either call kernel_power_off (which calls apci_sleep_prepare by way of acpi_shutdown) or to call acpi_sleep_prepare directly it is redundant to call acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_off. So simplify the code and simply don't call acpi_sleep_prepare. In addition there is a little error handling done so if we can't register the acpi class we don't hook pm_power_off. I think I have done the right thing with the CONFIG_PM define but I'm not certain. Can this code even be compiled if CONFIG_PM is false? Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-26[PATCH] acpi_power_off: Don't switch to the boot cpuEric W. Biederman
machine_power_off on i386 and x86_64 now switch to the boot cpu out of paranoia and because the MP Specification indicates it is a good idea on reboot, so for those architectures it is a noop. I can't see anything in the acpi spec that requires you to be on the boot cpu to power off the system, so this should not be an issue for ia64. In addition ia64 has the altix a massive multi-node system where switching to the boot cpu sounds insane as we may hot removed the boot cpu. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12[ACPI] Deprecate /proc/acpi/sleep in favor of /sys/power/stateLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-07-11[ACPI] ACPI poweroff fixAlexey Starikovskiy
Register an "acpi" system device to be notified of shutdown preparation. This depends on CONFIG_PM http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!