aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-07-16ACPICA: Add argument count checking to control method invocation via ↵Bob Moore
acpi_evaluate_object Error if too few arguments, warning if too many. This applies only to external programmatic control method execution, not method-to-method calls within the AML. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI PM: Remove obsolete Toshiba workaroundRafael J. Wysocki
Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI PM: acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() cleanupDavid Brownell
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-16dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.Len Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabledVegard Nossum
Ingo Molnar wrote: > -tip auto-testing started triggering this spinlock corruption message > yesterday: > > [ 3.976213] calling acpi_rtc_init+0x0/0xd3 > [ 3.980213] ACPI Exception (utmutex-0263): AE_BAD_PARAMETER, Thread F7C50000 could not acquire Mutex [3] [20080321] > [ 3.992213] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1 > [ 3.992213] lock: c2508dc4, .magic: 00000000, .owner: swapper/1, .owner_cpu: 0 This is apparently because some parts of ACPI, including mutexes, are not initialized when acpi=off is passed to the kernel. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16Make GPE disable more robustBob Moore
Implemented another change for the GPE disable. We now perform a read-change-write of the enable register instead of simply writing out the cached enable mask. This will prevent inadvertent enabling of GPEs if a rogue GPE is received during initialization (before GPE handlers are installed.) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6217 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16acpi: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap
Fix printk format warning: linux-next-20080617/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:1258: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: fix processor throttling set errorYi Yang
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 When echo some invalid values to /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling, there isn't any error info returned, on the contray, it sets throttling value to some T* successfully, obviously, this is incorrect, a correct way should be to let it fail and return error info. This patch fixed the aforementioned issue, it also enables /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling to accept such values as 't0' and 'T0', it also strictly limits /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling only to accept "*", "t*" and "T*", "*" is the throttling state value the processor can support, current, it is 0 - 7. Before applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "1xxxxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T1 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% *T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost acpi]# cd / [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "T100" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "2xxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T2 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% *T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# echo "7777" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# echo "7xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost /]# After applying this patch, the test result is below: [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T0 state available: T0 to T7 states: *T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# vi drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "7000" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo $? 0 [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling state count: 8 active state: T7 state available: T0 to T7 states: T0: 100% T1: 87% T2: 75% T3: 62% T4: 50% T5: 37% T6: 25% *T7: 12% [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo t0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo Tt0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: fix acpi fan state set errorYi Yang
Under /proc/acpi, there is a fan control interface, a user can set 0 or 3 to /proc/acpi/fan/*/state, 0 denotes D0 state, 3 denotes D3 state, but in current implementation, a user can set a fan to D1 state by any char excluding '1', '2' and '3'. For example: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost acpi]# echo "3" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "xxxxx" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on Obviously, such inputs as "" and "xxxxx" are invalid for fan state. This patch fixes this issue, it strictly limits fan state only to accept 0, 1, 2 and 3, any other inputs are invalid. Before applying this patch, the test result is: [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost acpi]# echo "3" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "xxxxx" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost acpi]# echo "3" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "3x" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost acpi]# echo "-1x" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost acpi]# After applying this patch, the test result is: [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "3" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "xxxxx" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "-1x" > /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "0" > //proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost ~]# echo "4" > //proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost ~]# echo "3" > //proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [root@localhost ~]# echo "0" > //proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [root@localhost ~]# echo "3x" > //proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost ~]# Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: fix checkpatch.pl complaints in scan.cAlok N Kataria
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: change processors from array to per_cpu variableMike Travis
Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16create sysfs link from acpi device to sysdev for cpuZhang Rui
Sys I/F under acpi device node and sysdev device node are both needed for cpu hot-removal. User space need this link so that they know they are poking the sys I/F for the same cpu. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16force offline the processor during hot-removalZhang Rui
The ACPI device node for the cpu has already been unregistered when acpi_processor_handle_eject is called. Thus we should offline the cpu and continue, rather than a failure here. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16fix a deadlock issue when poking "eject" fileZhang Rui
"/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/.../eject" is used to evaluate _EJx method and eject a device in user space. But system hangs when poking the "eject" file because that the device hot-removal code invoke the driver .remove method which will try to remove the "eject" file as a result. Queues the hot-removal function for deferred execution in this patch. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-16Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/xen/smp.c kernel/sched_rt.c net/iucv/iucv.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-15Merge branch 'generic-ipi' into generic-ipi-for-linusIngo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/powerpc/Kconfig arch/s390/kernel/time.c arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c arch/x86/kernel/i8259_64.c arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c arch/x86/kernel/nmi_64.c arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c arch/x86/xen/smp.c include/asm-x86/hw_irq_32.h include/asm-x86/hw_irq_64.h include/asm-x86/mach-default/irq_vectors.h include/asm-x86/mach-voyager/irq_vectors.h include/asm-x86/smp.h kernel/Makefile Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-10x86, VisWS: turn into generic arch, eliminate Kconfig specialsIngo Molnar
remove leftover traces of various VISWS related Kconfig specials. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08Revert parts of "x86: update mptable"Ingo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08Merge branch 'linus' into tmp.x86.mpparse.newIngo Molnar
2008-07-07PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-upRafael J. Wysocki
* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared'Rafael J. Wysocki
Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake functionRafael J. Wysocki
The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07ACPI: Introduce acpi_bus_power_manageable functionRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce function acpi_bus_power_manageable() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to power manage given device. This may be useful, for example, for PCI device power management. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-06Merge commit 'v2.6.26-rc9' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
2008-07-05x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resumeH. Peter Anvin
Some Dell laptops enter resume with apparent garbage in the segment descriptor registers (almost certainly the result of a botched transition from protected to real mode.) The only way to clean that up is to enter protected mode ourselves and clean out the descriptor registers. This fixes resume on Dell XPS M1210 and Dell D620. Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927 Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-04rtc: fix CMOS time error after writing /proc/acpi/alarmHuacai Chen
When writing /proc/acpi/alarm in adjust mode, e.g. echo "+0000-00-00 00:00:15" >/proc/acpi/alarm The "century" field should be read and added to "year" field before writing, otherwise the CMOS time will go back to 2000 years ago, e.g. # cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0008-06-21 11:38:46 Then the system time may be reset to the date of manufacture after rebooting. This patch fixed this issue. Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <huacai.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Acked-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-06-26smp_call_function: get rid of the unused nonatomic/retry argumentJens Axboe
It's never used and the comments refer to nonatomic and retry interchangably. So get rid of it. Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-06-26dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.Len Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-26ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabledVegard Nossum
Ingo Molnar wrote: > -tip auto-testing started triggering this spinlock corruption message > yesterday: > > [ 3.976213] calling acpi_rtc_init+0x0/0xd3 > [ 3.980213] ACPI Exception (utmutex-0263): AE_BAD_PARAMETER, Thread F7C50000 could not acquire Mutex [3] [20080321] > [ 3.992213] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1 > [ 3.992213] lock: c2508dc4, .magic: 00000000, .owner: swapper/1, .owner_cpu: 0 This is apparently because some parts of ACPI, including mutexes, are not initialized when acpi=off is passed to the kernel. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-20Merge branch 'bugzilla-9761' into releaseLen Brown
2008-06-14ACPI: no AC status notificationLen Brown
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-14ACPI Exception (video-1721): UNKNOWN_STATUS_CODE, Cant attach deviceZhang Rui
The child of a video bus device is not alway a video device. It should be a warn message rather than an exception here. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9761 Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-12Suspend-related patches for 2.6.27Rafael J. Wysocki
ACPI PM: Add possibility to change suspend sequence There are some systems out there that don't work correctly with our current suspend/hibernation code ordering. Provide a workaround for these systems allowing them to pass 'acpi_sleep=old_ordering' in the kernel command line so that it will use the pre-ACPI 2.0 ("old") suspend code ordering. Unfortunately, this requires us to add a platform hook to the resuming of devices for recovering the platform in case one of the device drivers' .suspend() routines returns error code. Namely, ACPI 1.0 specifies that _PTS should be called before suspending devices, but _WAK still should be called before resuming them in order to undo the changes made by _PTS. However, if there is an error during suspending devices, they are automatically resumed without returning control to the PM core, so the _WAK has to be called from within device_resume() in that cases. The patch also reorders and refactors the ACPI suspend/hibernation code to avoid duplication as far as reasonably possible. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-06-12Merge branch 'suspend' of ↵Jesse Barnes
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 into linux-next
2008-06-11ACPI PM: Remove obsolete Toshiba workaroundRafael J. Wysocki
Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI PM: acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() cleanupDavid Brownell
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: fix stray va_end() caused by mis-mergeLen Brown
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI: Reject below-freezing temperatures as invalid critical temperaturesArjan van de Ven
My laptop thinks that it's a good idea to give -73C as the critical CPU temperature.... which isn't the best thing since it causes a shutdown right at bootup. Temperatures below freezing are clearly invalid critical thresholds so just reject these as such. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: Fix for access to deleted object <regression>Bob Moore
Fixes problem introduced in 20080123, with fix for Unload operator. Parse tree object can be already deleted; must use the opcode within the WalkState. ACPI: kmemcheck: Caught 16-bit read from freed memory http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10669 Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: Fix to make _SST method optionalBob Moore
Fixes a problem introduced in 20080514 where the status of execution of _SST is incorrectly returned to the caller. _SST is optional, and if it is AE_NOT_FOUND, the exception should be ignored. http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=716 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: Fix for Load operator, load table at the namespace rootBob Moore
This reverts a change introduced in version 20071019. The table is now loaded at the namespace root even though this goes against the ACPI specification. This provides compatibility with other ACPI implementations. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: Ignore ACPI table signature for Load() operatorBob Moore
Only "SSDT" is acceptable to the ACPI spec, but tables are seen with OEMx and null sigs. Therefore, signature validation is worthless. Apparently MS ACPI accepts such signatures, ACPICA must be compatible. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPICA: Fix to allow zero-length ASL field declarationsBob Moore
Allows null field list in Field(), BankField(), and IndexField(). 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10606 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI: use memory_read_from_buffer()Akinobu Mita
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11bay: exit if notify handler cannot be installedHolger Macht
If acpi_install_notify_handler() for a bay device fails, the bay driver is superfluous. Most likely, another driver (like libata) is already caring about this device anyway. Furthermore, register_hotplug_dock_device(acpi_handle) from the dock driver must not be called twice with the same handler. This would result in an endless loop consuming 100% of CPU. So clean up and exit. Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11dock.c remove trailing printk whitespaceTim Pepper
Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <lnxninja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11proper prototype for acpi_processor_tstate_has_changed()Adrian Bunk
This patch adds a proper prototype for acpi_processor_tstate_has_changed() in include/acpi/processor.h Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI: handle invalid ACPI SLIT tableFenghua Yu
This is a SLIT sanity checking patch. It moves slit_valid() function to generic ACPI code and does sanity checking for both x86 and ia64. It sets up node_distance with LOCAL_DISTANCE and REMOTE_DISTANCE when hitting invalid SLIT table on ia64. It also cleans up unused variable localities in acpi_parse_slit() on x86. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI 2.6.26-rc2: Add missing newline to DSDT/SSDT warning messageAlistair John Strachan
As of recently (probably 2.6.26-rc1) I've been getting the following mangling in the kernel log: [4294014.568167] ACPI: DSDT override uses original SSDTs unless "acpi_no_auto_ssdt"<6>CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz stepping 0d This is due to a missing newline character in the first message. The following patch against 2.6.26-rc2 fixes it. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-06-11ACPI: EC: Use msleep instead of udelay while waiting for event.Alexey Starikovskiy
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-18 20:22:38 +0000