aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-10-04[CPUFREQ] allow ondemand and conservative cpufreq governors to be used as ↵Thomas Renninger
default Depending on the transition latency of the HW for cpufreq switches, the ondemand or conservative governor cannot be used with certain cpufreq drivers. Still the ondemand should be the default governor on a wide range of systems. This patch allows this and lets the governor fallback to the performance governor at cpufreq driver load time, if the driver does not support fast enough frequency switching. Main benefit is that on e.g. installation or other systems without userspace support a working dynamic cpufreq support can be achieved on most systems by simply loading the cpufreq driver. This is especially essential for recent x86(_64) laptop hardware which may rely on working dynamic cpufreq OS support. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2007-02-16Merge master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davej/cpufreqLinus Torvalds
* master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davej/cpufreq: [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Redo Longhaul ver. 2 [CPUFREQ] EPS - Correct 2nd brand test [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Separate frequency and voltage transition [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Models of Nehemiah [CPUFREQ] Whitespace fixup [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Simplier minmult [CPUFREQ] CPU_FREQ_TABLE shouldn't be a def_tristate [CPUFREQ] ondemand governor use new cpufreq rwsem locking in work callback [CPUFREQ] ondemand governor restructure the work callback [CPUFREQ] Rewrite lock in cpufreq to eliminate cpufreq/hotplug related issues [CPUFREQ] Remove hotplug cpu crap [CPUFREQ] Enhanced PowerSaver driver [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Add VT8235 support [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Fix guess_fsb function [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Remove duplicate tables [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Introduce Nehemiah C [CPUFREQ] fix cpuinfo_cur_freq for CPU_HW_PSTATE [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Remove "ignore_latency" option
2007-02-14[PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.hTim Schmielau
After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes. There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need anything defined in there. Presumably these includes were once needed for macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the course of cleaning it up. To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble. Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all configs in arch/arm/configs on arm. I also checked that no new warnings were introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted by unnecessarily included header files). Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-10[CPUFREQ] Remove hotplug cpu crapDave Jones
The hotplug CPU locking in cpufreq is horrendous. No-one seems to care enough to fix it, so just remove it so that the 99.9% of the real world users of this code can use cpufreq without being bothered by warnings. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-12-12Merge ../linusDave Jones
Conflicts: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
2006-11-22WorkStruct: make allyesconfigDavid Howells
Fix up for make allyesconfig. Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2006-11-06[CPUFREQ] Fix coding style issues in cpufreq.Gautham R Shenoy
Clean up cpufreq subsystem to fix coding style issues and to improve the readability. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-10-21[CPUFREQ] handle sysfs errorsJeff Garzik
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-26[PATCH] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizareArjan van de Ven
The patch below moves the cpu hotplugging higher up in the cpufreq layering; this is needed to avoid recursive taking of the cpu hotplug lock and to otherwise detangle the mess. The new rules are: 1. you must do lock_cpu_hotplug() around the following functions: __cpufreq_driver_target __cpufreq_governor (for CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS operation only) __cpufreq_set_policy 2. governer methods (.governer) must NOT take the lock_cpu_hotplug() lock in any way; they are called with the lock taken already 3. if your governer spawns a thread that does things, like calling __cpufreq_driver_target, your thread must honor rule #1. 4. the policy lock and other cpufreq internal locks nest within the lock_cpu_hotplug() lock. I'm not entirely happy about how the __cpufreq_governor rule ended up (conditional locking rule depending on the argument) but basically all callers pass this as a constant so it's not too horrible. The patch also removes the cpufreq_governor() function since during the locking audit it turned out to be entirely unused (so no need to fix it) The patch works on my testbox, but it could use more testing (otoh... it can't be much worse than the current code) Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23[PATCH] cpufreq build fixAndrew Morton
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'do_dbs_timer': drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:374: warning: implicit declaration of function 'lock_cpu_hotplug' drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:381: warning: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_cpu_hotplug' drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c: In function 'do_dbs_timer': drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c:425: warning: implicit declaration of function 'lock_cpu_hotplug' drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c:432: warning: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_cpu_hotplug' Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-21[CPUFREQ] Fix ondemand vs suspend deadlockVenkatesh Pallipadi
Rootcaused the bug to a deadlock in cpufreq and ondemand. Due to non-existent ordering between cpu_hotplug lock and dbs_mutex. Basically a race condition between cpu_down() and do_dbs_timer(). cpu_down() flow: * cpu_down() call for CPU 1 * Takes hot plug lock * Calls pre down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls cpufreq_driver_target() which takes cpu_hotplug lock again. OK as cpu_hotplug lock is recursive in same process context * CPU 1 goes down * Calls post down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls ondemand event stop which takes dbs_mutex So, cpu_hotplug lock is taken before dbs_mutex in this flow. do_dbs_timer is triggerred by a periodic timer event. It first takes dbs_mutex and then takes cpu_hotplug lock in cpufreq_driver_target(). Note the reverse order here compared to above. So, if this timer event happens at right moment during cpu_down, system will deadlok. Attached patch fixes the issue for both ondemand and conservative. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-04-01[CPUFREQ] Remove pointless check in conservative governor.Dave Jones
< 0 checks on unsigned variables are pointless. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-03-28[CPUFREQ] cpufreq_conservative: keep ignore_nice_load and freq_step values ↵Mattia Dongili
when reselected Keep the value of ignore_nice_load and freq_step of the conservative governor after the governor is deselected and reselected. Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-03-26[PATCH] cpufreq_conservative: alternative initialise approachAlexander Clouter
Venki, author of cpufreq_ondemand, came up with a neater way to remove the initialiser code from the main loop of my code and out to the point when the governor is actually initialised. Not only does it look but it also feels cleaner, plus its simpler to understand. It also saves a bunch of pointless conditional statements in the main loop. Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
2006-03-26[PATCH] cpufreq_conservative: make for_each_cpu() safeAlexander Clouter
All these changes should make cpufreq_conservative safe in regards to the x86 for_each_cpu cpumask.h changes and whatnot. Whilst making it safe a number of pointless for loops related to the cpu mask's were removed. I was never comfortable with all those for loops, especially as the iteration is over the same data again and again for each CPU you had in a single poll, an O(n^2) outcome to frequency scaling. The approach I use is to assume by default no CPU's exist and it sets the requested_freq to zero as a kind of flag, the reasoning is in the source ;) If the CPU is queried and requested_freq is zero then it initialises the variable to current_freq and then continues as if nothing happened which should be the same net effect as before? Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
2006-03-26[PATCH] cpufreq_conservative: alter default responsivenessAlexander Clouter
The sensible approach to making conservative less responsive than ondemand :) As mentioned in patch [1/4]. We do not want conservative to shoot through all the frequencies, its point (by default) is to slowly move through them. By default its ten times less responsive. Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
2006-03-26[PATCH] cpufreq_conservative: aligning of codebase with ondemandAlexander Clouter
Since the conservative govenor was released its codebase has drifted from the the direction and updates that have been applied to the ondemand govornor. This patch addresses the lack of updates in that period and brings conservative back up to date. The resulting diff file between cpufreq_ondemand.c and cpufreq_conservative.c is now much smaller and shows more clearly the differences between the two. Another reason to do this is ages ago, knowingly, I did a piss poor attempt at making conservative less responsive by knocking up DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER by two orders of magnitude. I did fix this ages ago but in my dis-organisation I must have toasted the diff and left it the way it was. About two weeks ago a user contacted me saying he was having problems with the conservative governor with his AMD Athlon XP-M 2800+ as /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative showed sampling_rate_min 9950000 sampling_rate_max 1360065408 Nine seconds to decide about changing the frequency....not too responsive :) Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
2006-01-18[CPUFREQ] Convert drivers/cpufreq semaphores to mutexes.akpm@osdl.org
Semaphore to mutex conversion. The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated automatically via a script as well. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-12-01[PATCH] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'Alexander Clouter
The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it. This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a 'ignore_nice_load' entry that defaults to '0'; meaning nice'd processes _are_ counted towards the 'business' calculation. WARNING: this obvious breaks any userland tools that expected ignore_nice' to exist, to draw attention to this fact it was concluded on the mailing list that the entry should be removed altogether so the userland app breaks and so the author can build simple to detect workaround. Having said that it seems currently very few tools even make use of this functionality; all I could find was a Gentoo Wiki entry. Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-10-27[PATCH] cpufreq: SMP fix for conservative governorDave Jones
Don't try to access not-present CPUs. Conservative governor will always oops on SMP without this fix. Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-31[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-upDave Jones
[PATCH] [3/5] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-up Ondemand and conservative governor clean-up, it factorises the idle ticks measurement. Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpusDave Jones
[PATCH] [2/5] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Ondemand, conservative governor did not store prev_cpu_idle_up into prev_cpu_idle_down for other CPUs than the current CPU. Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanupDave Jones
[PATCH] [1/5] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Attached patch fixes some minor issues with Alexander's patch and related cleanup in both ondemand and conservative governor. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31[CPUFREQ] Conservative cpufreq governerDave Jones
A new cpufreq module, based on the ondemand one with my additional patches just posted. This one is more suitable for battery environments where its probably more appealing to have the cpu freq gracefully increase and decrease rather than flip between the min and max freq's. N.B. Bruno Ducrot pointed out that the amd64's "do have unacceptable latency between min and max freq transition, due to the step-by-step requirements (200MHz IIRC)"; so AMD64 users would probably benefit from this too. Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>