| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Allow generic frame-buffer code to correctly write texts and blit images for
1, 2 and 4 bit per pixel frame-buffer organizations when pixels in bytes are
organized to in opposite order than bytes in long type.
Overhead should be reasonable. If option is not selected, than compiler
should eliminate completely all overhead.
The feature is disabled at compile time if CONFIG_FB_CFB_REV_PIXELS_IN_BYTE is
not set.
[adaplas]
Convert helper functions to macros if feature is not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Consolidate common drawing functions into a single header file.
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
|
|
The drawing function cfbfillrect does not work correctly when access is not
unsigned-long aligned. It manifests as extra lines of pixels that are not
complete drawn. Reversing the shift operator solves the problem, so I would
presume that this bug would manifest only on little endian machines. The
function cfbcopyarea may also have this bug.
Aligned access should present no problems.
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Remove software clipping from imageblit, fillrect and copyarea. Clipping is
not needed because the console layer assures that reads/writes doest not
happen beyond the extents of the framebuffer. And software clipping tends to
hide bugs, if they do exist.
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
