| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
A data node might not be in the fraglist; it could be f->metadata.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
This allows us to drop another pointer from the struct jffs2_raw_node_ref,
shrinking it to 8 bytes on 32-bit machines (if the TEST_TOTLEN) paranoia
check is turned off, which will be committed soon).
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Print wasted_size in scanned eraseblocks, print range correctly for
summary dirent and inode entries.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Preallocation of refs is shortly going to be a per-eraseblock thing,
rather than per-filesystem. Add the required argument to the function.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
... to jffs2_free_jeb_node_refs() since that's what it does.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
One more place where we were changing the accounting info without
actually allocating a ref for the lost space...
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Random unthinking 'cleanup' caused debug messages like this:
Obsoleting node at 0x0006daf4 of len 0x3a4: <7>Dirtying
If messages are continuation of an existing line, they don't need
to be prefixed with KERN_DEBUG.
THINK. Or you will be replaced by a small shell script.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
|
|
Another part of the preparation for switching to an array...
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
As the first step towards eliminating the ref->next_phys member and saving
memory by using an _array_ of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref per eraseblock,
stop the write functions from allocating their own refs; have them just
_reserve_ the appropriate number instead. Then jffs2_link_node_ref() can
just fill them in.
Use a linked list of pre-allocated refs in the superblock, for now. Once
we switch to an array, it'll just be a case of extending that array.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
MTD clients are agnostic of FLASH which needs ECC suppport.
Remove the functions and fixup the callers.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
The writev based write buffer implementation was far to complex as
in most use cases the write buffer had to be handled anyway.
Simplify the write buffer handling and use mtd->write instead.
From extensive testing no performance impact has been noted.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
We don't need the upper layers to deal with the physical offset. It's
_always_ c->nextblock->offset + c->sector_size - c->nextblock->free_size
so we might as well just let the actual write functions deal with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
o Add a flag MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE for devices that allow single bits to be
cleared.
o Replace MTD_PROGRAM_REGIONS with a cleared MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE flag for
STMicro and Intel Sibley flashes with internal ECC. Those flashes
disallow clearing of single bits, unlike regular NOR flashes, so the
new flag models their behaviour better.
o Remove MTD_ECC. After the STMicro/Sibley merge, this flag is only set
and never checked.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
|
|
In 2002, STMicro started producing NOR flashes with internal ECC protection
for small blocks (8 or 16 bytes). Support for those flashes was added by me.
In 2005, Intel Sibley flashes copied this strategy and Nico added support for
those. Merge the code for both.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
|
|
At least two flashes exists that have the concept of a minimum write unit,
similar to NAND pages, but no other NAND characteristics. Therefore, rename
the minimum write unit to "writesize" for all flashes, including NAND.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
|
|
We'll be using a proper list of nodes in the jffs2_xattr_datum and
jffs2_xattr_ref structures, because the existing code to overwrite
them is just broken. Put it in the common part at the front of the
structure which is shared with the jffs2_inode_cache, so that the
jffs2_link_node_ref() function can do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the
->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check
for that, since we expect it to change soon.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing
it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead.
This highlights the ugliness of what we're currently doing with
xattr_datum and xattr_ref structures -- we should find a nicer way of
dealing with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
When filing REF_OBSOLETE nodes, we'd add their size to the global
'dirty_size' count, but then to the eraseblock's 'used_size' count.
That's not clever.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
I added an argument to the real function...
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Well, almost. We'll actually keep a 'TEST_TOTLEN' macro set for now, and keep
doing some paranoia checks to make sure it's all working correctly. But if
TEST_TOTLEN is unset, the size of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref drops from 16
bytes to 12 on 32-bit machines. That's a saving of about half a megabyte of
memory on the OLPC prototype board, with 125K or so nodes in its 512MiB of
flash.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
We can't use jffs2_scan_dirty_space() because it doesn't do any locking; it's
only for use at scan time -- hence the 'scan' in the name.
Also, don't allocate refs while we have c->erase_completion_lock held.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
We don't allocate this locally any more -- it's given to us and owner by
our caller. Also improve the debug messages a little.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Next step in ongoing campaign to file a struct jffs2_raw_node_ref for every
piece of dirty space in the system, so that __totlen can be killed off....
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
If __totlen is going away, we need to pass the length in separately.
Also stop callers from needlessly setting ref->next_phys to NULL,
since that's done for them... and since that'll also be going away soon.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Make sure we allocate a ref for any dirty space which exists between nodes
which we find in an eraseblock summary.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
The incoming ref_totlen() calculation is going to rely on the existence
of nodes which cover all dirty space. We can't just tweak the accounting
data any more; we have to call jffs2_scan_dirty_space() to do it.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
To eliminate the __totlen field from struct jffs2_raw_node_ref, we need
to allocate nodes for dirty space instead of just tweaking the accounting
data. Introduce jffs2_scan_dirty_space() in preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
For RWCOMPAT and ROCOMPAT nodes, we should still allow the mount to
succeed. Just abandon the summary and fall through to the full scan.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
If we had to allocate extra space for the summary node, we weren't
correctly freeing it when jffs2_sum_scan_sumnode() returned nonzero --
which is both the success and the failure case. Only when it returned
zero, which means fall through to the full scan, were we correctly freeing
the buffer.
Document the meaning of those return codes while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
We should preserve these when we come to garbage collect them, not let
them get erased. Use jffs2_garbage_collect_pristine() for this, and make
sure the summary code copes -- just refrain from writing a summary for any
block which contains a node we don't understand.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
It should all be counted as dirty space, not wasted and _definitely_ not
unchecked.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock and adjust the space accounting
accordingly. Move it out-of-line.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
We were calling ref_totlen() 18 times. Even before that becomes a real
function rather than just a dereference, apparently some compilers still
suck anyway. It'll _certainly_ suck after ref_totlen() becomes more
complicated, so calculate it once and don't rely on CSE.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
This improves the time to mount 512MiB of NAND flash on my OLPC prototype
by about 4%. We used to read the last page of the eraseblock twice -- once
to find the offset of the summary node, and again to actually _read_ the
summary node. Now we read the last page only once, and read more only if
we need to.
We also don't allocate a new buffer just for the summary code -- we use
the buffer which was already allocated for the scan. Better still, if the
'buffer' for the scan is actually just a pointer directly into NOR flash,
we use that too, avoiding the memcpy() which we used to do.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Remove forgotten lines from jffs2_scan_eraseblock() which
were unnecessary and may cause problem in some environments.
Thanks to Alexander Belyakov <alexander.belyakov@intel.com>.
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Device node major/minor numbers are just stored in the payload of a single
data node. Just extend that to 4 bytes and use new_encode_dev() for it.
We only use the 4-byte format if we _need_ to, if !old_valid_dev(foo).
This preserves backwards compatibility with older code as much as
possible. If we do make devices with major or minor numbers above 255, and
then mount the file system with the old code, it'll just read the first
two bytes and get the numbers wrong. If it comes to garbage-collect it,
it'll then write back those wrong numbers. But that's about the best we
can expect.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
|
|
fs/jffs2/summary.c: In function ‘jffs2_sum_write_data’:
fs/jffs2/summary.c:658: warning: format ‘%zd’ expects type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint32_t’
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
Mark certain functions with __init and __exit appropriately.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
If jffs2_scan_eraseblock() fails and the exit path is taken, 's' is not
being deallocated.
Reported by Coverity, CID: 1258.
Signed-off-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
fs/jffs2/nodelist.c: In function `check_node_data':
fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:441: warning: unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 4)
fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:464: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 5)
Modified from Andrew's original fix because while his terminal may indeed
only have eighty columns, mine only has _TWENTYFOUR_ lines. So the
cosmetic fluff is perfectly OK out past column 80 where it was -- the
casual reader doesn't _care_ about anything more than the fact that it
goes 'if (foo) JFFS2_WARNING...', and there's no point wasting a whole
line to display the tail end of the printk which nobody actually cares
about.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
If we use __attribute__((packed)), GCC will _also_ assume that the
structures aren't sensibly aligned, and it'll emit code to cope with
that instead of straight word load/save. This can be _very_ suboptimal
on architectures like ARM.
Ideally, we want an attribute which just tells GCC not to do any
padding, without the alignment side-effects. In the absense of that,
we'll just drop the 'packed' attribute and hope that everything stays as
it was (which to be fair is fairly much what we expect). And add some
paranoia checks in the initialisation code, which should be optimised
away completely in the normal case.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
