aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-03-27[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: fix inheritance flags on v4 ace derived from posix ↵Bruce Fields
default ace A regression introduced in the last set of acl patches removed the INHERIT_ONLY flag from aces derived from the posix acl. Fix. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: fix handling of directories without default ACLsJ. Bruce Fields
When setting an ACL that lacks inheritable ACEs on a directory, we should set a default ACL of zero length, not a default ACL with all bits denied. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: avoid unnecessary deniesJ. Bruce Fields
We're inserting deny's between some ACEs in order to enforce posix draft acl semantics which prevent permissions from accumulating across entries in an acl. That's fine, but we're doing that by inserting a deny after *every* allow, which is overkill. We shouldn't be adding them in places where they actually make no difference. Also replaced some helper functions for creating acl entries; I prefer just assigning directly to the struct fields--it takes a few more lines, but the field names provide some documentation that I think makes the result easier understand. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: don't return explicit maskJ. Bruce Fields
Return just the effective permissions, and forget about the mask. It isn't worth the complexity. WARNING: This breaks backwards compatibility with overly-picky nfsv4->posix acl translation, as may has been included in some patched versions of libacl. To our knowledge no such version was every distributed by anyone outside citi. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: represent nfsv4 acl with array instead of linked listJ. Bruce Fields
Simplify the memory management and code a bit by representing acls with an array instead of a linked list. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: simplify nfsv4->posix translationJ. Bruce Fields
The code that splits an incoming nfsv4 ACL into inheritable and effective parts can be combined with the the code that translates each to a posix acl, resulting in simpler code that requires one less pass through the ACL. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-16[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: relax checking of ACL inheritance bitsJ. Bruce Fields
The rfc allows us to be more permissive about the ACL inheritance bits we accept: "If the server supports a single "inherit ACE" flag that applies to both files and directories, the server may reject the request (i.e., requiring the client to set both the file and directory inheritance flags). The server may also accept the request and silently turn on the ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE flag." Let's take the latter option--the ACL is a complex attribute that could be rejected for a wide variety of reasons, and the protocol gives us little ability to explain the reason for the rejection, so erroring out is a user-unfriendly last resort. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: fix handling of zero-length aclsJ.Bruce Fields
It is legal to have zero-length NFSv4 acls; they just deny everything. Also, nfs4_acl_nfsv4_to_posix will always return with pacl and dpacl set on success, so the caller doesn't need to check this. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: simplify nfs4_acl_nfsv4_to_posix interfaceJ.Bruce Fields
There's no need to handle the case where the caller passes in null for pacl or dpacl; no caller does that, because it would be a dumb thing to do. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: fix inheritanceJ.Bruce Fields
We can be a little more flexible about the flags allowed for inheritance (in particular, we can deal with either the presence or the absence of INHERIT_ONLY), but we should probably reject other combinations that we don't understand. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-04[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: relax the nfsv4->posix mappingJ.Bruce Fields
Use a different nfsv4->(draft posix) acl mapping which is 1. completely backwards compatible, 2. accepts any nfsv4 acl, and 3. errs on the side of restricting permissions. In detail: 1. completely backwards compatible: The new mapping produces the same result on any acl produced by the existing (draft posix)->nfsv4 mapping; the one exception is that we no longer attempt to guess the value of the mask by assuming certain denies represent the mask. Since the server still keeps track of the mask locally, sequences of chmod's will still be handled fine; the only thing this will change is sequences of chmod's with intervening read-modify-writes of the acl. That last case just isn't worth the trouble and the possible misrepresentations of the user's intent (if we guess that a certain deny indicates masking is in effect when it really isn't). 2. accepts any nfsv4 acl: That's not quite true: we still reject acls that use combinations of inheritance flags that we don't support. We also reject acls that attempt to explicitly deny read_acl or read_attributes permissions, or that attempt to deny write_acl or write_attributes permissions to the owner of the file. 3. errs on the side of restricting permissions: one exception to this last rule: we totally ignore some bits (write_owner, synchronize, read_named_attributes, etc.) that are completely alien to our filesystem semantics, in some cases even if that would mean ignoring an explicit deny that we have no intention of enforcing. Excepting that, the posix acl produced should be the most permissive acl that is not more permissive than the given nfsv4 acl. And the new code's shorter, too. Neato. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-04-11[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: better nfs4acl errorsNeilBrown
We're returning -1 in a few places in the NFSv4<->POSIX acl translation code where we could return a reasonable error. Also allows some minor simplification elsewhere. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-04-11[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: Wrong error handling in nfs4aclNeilBrown
this fixes coverity id #3. Coverity detected dead code, since the == -1 comparison only returns 0 or 1 to error. Therefore the if ( error < 0 ) statement was always false. Seems that this was an if( error = nfs4... ) statement some time ago, which got broken during cleanup. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-24[PATCH] fs: Use ARRAY_SIZE macroTobias Klauser
Use ARRAY_SIZE macro instead of sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]) and remove a duplicate of ARRAY_SIZE. Some trailing whitespaces are also deleted. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@nuerscht.ch> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-24[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: make needlessly global code staticNeilBrown
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global code static Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!