| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
code to prepare for an upcoming mod which will introduce multi-level
in-core extent allocations. Although the in-core extent management is
using a new code path in this mod, the functionality remains the same.
Major changes include: - Introduce 10 new subroutines which re-orgainze
the existing code but do NOT change functionality:
xfs_iext_get_ext() xfs_iext_insert() xfs_iext_add()
xfs_iext_remove() xfs_iext_remove_inline()
xfs_iext_remove_direct() xfs_iext_realloc_direct()
xfs_iext_direct_to_inline() xfs_iext_inline_to_direct()
xfs_iext_destroy() - Remove 2 subroutines (functionality moved to new
subroutines above): xfs_iext_realloc() -replaced by xfs_iext_add()
and xfs_iext_remove() xfs_bmap_insert_exlist() - replaced by
xfs_iext_insert() xfs_bmap_delete_exlist() - replaced by
xfs_iext_remove() - Replace all hard-coded (indexed) extent assignments
with a call to xfs_iext_get_ext() - Replace all extent record pointer
arithmetic (ep++, ep--, base + lastx,..) with calls to
xfs_iext_get_ext() - Update comments to remove the idea of a single
"extent list" and introduce "extent record" terminology instead
SGI-PV: 928864
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:207390a
Signed-off-by: Mandy Kirkconnell <alkirkco@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 943272
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:201006a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
boilerplate.
SGI-PV: 913862
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23903a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 943122
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
Christoph).
SGI-PV: 942400
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:23771a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 936255
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192759a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
