aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcuclassic.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-01-03cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fixIngo Molnar
Impact: cleanup This warning: kernel/rcuclassic.c: In function ‘rcu_start_batch’: kernel/rcuclassic.c:397: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘cpumask_andnot’ from incompatible pointer type triggers because one usage site of rcp->cpumask was not converted to to_cpumask(rcp->cpumask). There's no ill effects of this bug. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-03Merge branch 'master' of ↵Mike Travis
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-cpumask into merge-rr-cpumask Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c kernel/rcuclassic.c kernel/sched.c kernel/time/tick-sched.c Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> [ mingo@elte.hu: backmerged typo fix for io_apic.c ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-01cpumask: convert RCU implementationsRusty Russell
Impact: use new cpumask API. rcu_ctrlblk contains a cpumask, and it's highly optimized so I don't want a cpumask_var_t (ie. a pointer) for the CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK case. It could use a dangling bitmap, and be allocated in __rcu_init to save memory, but for the moment we use a bitmap. (Eventually 'struct cpumask' will be undefined for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK, so we use a bitmap here to show we really mean it). We remove on-stack cpumasks, using cpumask_var_t for rcu_torture_shuffle_tasks() and for_each_cpu_and in force_quiescent_state(). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2008-11-24sched: convert nohz_cpu_mask to cpumask_var_t.Rusty Russell
Impact: (future) size reduction for large NR_CPUS. Dynamically allocating cpumasks (when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK) saves space for small nr_cpu_ids but big CONFIG_NR_CPUS. cpumask_var_t is just a struct cpumask for !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-03rcu: make rcu-stall debug printout more standardIngo Molnar
Impact: change debug printout Change "RCU detected CPU stall" to "INFO: RCU detected CPU stall" message, to make it easier for tools to pick up the warning. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-03rcu: RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs for Classic RCU, fixIngo Molnar
fix the !CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR path: kernel/rcuclassic.c: In function '__rcu_pending': kernel/rcuclassic.c:609: error: too few arguments to function 'check_cpu_stall' Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-03rcu: RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs for Classic RCUPaul E. McKenney
This patch adds stalled-CPU detection to Classic RCU. This capability is enabled by a new config variable CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR, which defaults disabled. This is a debugging feature to detect infinite loops in kernel code, not something that non-kernel-hackers would be expected to care about. This feature can detect looping CPUs in !PREEMPT builds and looping CPUs with preemption disabled in PREEMPT builds. This is essentially a port of this functionality from the treercu patch, replacing the stall debug patch that is already in tip/core/rcu (commit 67182ae1c4). The changes from the patch in tip/core/rcu include making the config variable name match that in treercu, changing from seconds to jiffies to avoid spurious warnings, and printing a boot message when this feature is enabled. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23rcu: fix sparse shadowed variable warningHarvey Harrison
kernel/rcuclassic.c:564:18: warning: symbol 'flags' shadows an earlier one kernel/rcuclassic.c:527:16: originally declared here Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-27rcuclassic: fix compiler warningHiroshi Shimamoto
CC kernel/rcuclassic.o kernel/rcuclassic.c: In function 'rcu_init_percpu_data': kernel/rcuclassic.c:705: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast kernel/rcuclassic.c:713: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast flags should be unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-21rcu: use irq-safe locksPaul E. McKenney
Some earlier tip/core/rcu patches caused RCU to incorrectly enable irqs too early in boot. This caused Yinghai's repeated-kexec testing to hit oopses, presumably due to so that device interrupts left over from the prior kernel instance (which would oops the newly booting kernel before it got a chance to reset said devices). This patch therefore converts all the local_irq_disable()s in rcuclassic.c to local_irq_save(). Besides, I never did like local_irq_disable() anyway. ;-) Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-19rcuclassic: fix compilation NGHiroshi Shimamoto
fix: CC kernel/rcuclassic.o kernel/rcuclassic.c: In function '__rcu_process_callbacks': kernel/rcuclassic.c:561: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/rcuclassic.c:561: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/rcuclassic.c:561: error: for each function it appears in.) Declare missing variable flags. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-19rcu: fix locking cleanup falloutPaul E. McKenney
Given that the rcp->lock is now acquired from call_rcu(), which can be invoked from irq-disable regions, all acquisitions need to disable irqs. The following patch fixes this. Although I don't have any reason to believe that this is the cause of Yinghai's oops, it does need to be fixed. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-17rcu: fix classic RCU locking cleanup lockdep problemPaul E. McKenney
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Paul, > > one of your two recent RCU patches caused this lockdep splat in -tip > testing: > > -------------------> > Brought up 2 CPUs > Total of 2 processors activated (6850.87 BogoMIPS). > PM: Adding info for No Bus:platform > khelper used greatest stack depth: 3124 bytes left > > ================================= > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > 2.6.27-rc3-tip #1 > --------------------------------- > inconsistent {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-W} usage. > ksoftirqd/0/4 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: > (&rcu_ctrlblk.lock){-+..}, at: [<c016d91c>] __rcu_process_callbacks+0x1ac/0x1f0 > {softirq-on-W} state was registered at: > [<c01528e4>] __lock_acquire+0x3f4/0x5b0 > [<c0152b29>] lock_acquire+0x89/0xc0 > [<c076142b>] _spin_lock+0x3b/0x70 > [<c016d649>] rcu_init_percpu_data+0x29/0x80 > [<c075e43f>] rcu_cpu_notify+0xaf/0xd0 > [<c076458d>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x60 > [<c0145ede>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x1e/0x30 > [<c075db29>] _cpu_up+0x79/0x110 > [<c075dc0d>] cpu_up+0x4d/0x70 > [<c0a769e1>] kernel_init+0xb1/0x200 > [<c01048a3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff > irq event stamp: 14 > hardirqs last enabled at (14): [<c01534db>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 > hardirqs last disabled at (13): [<c014dbeb>] trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10 > softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c012b186>] copy_process+0x276/0x1190 > softirqs last disabled at (11): [<c0105c0a>] call_on_stack+0x1a/0x30 > > other info that might help us debug this: > no locks held by ksoftirqd/0/4. > > stack backtrace: > Pid: 4, comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-tip #1 > [<c01504dc>] print_usage_bug+0x16c/0x1b0 > [<c0152455>] mark_lock+0xa75/0xb10 > [<c0108b75>] ? sched_clock+0x15/0x30 > [<c015289d>] __lock_acquire+0x3ad/0x5b0 > [<c0152b29>] lock_acquire+0x89/0xc0 > [<c016d91c>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x1ac/0x1f0 > [<c076142b>] _spin_lock+0x3b/0x70 > [<c016d91c>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x1ac/0x1f0 > [<c016d91c>] __rcu_process_callbacks+0x1ac/0x1f0 > [<c016d986>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x26/0x50 > [<c0132305>] __do_softirq+0x95/0x120 > [<c0132270>] ? __do_softirq+0x0/0x120 > [<c0105c0a>] call_on_stack+0x1a/0x30 > [<c0132426>] ? ksoftirqd+0x96/0x110 > [<c0132390>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x110 > [<c01411f7>] ? kthread+0x47/0x80 > [<c01411b0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80 > [<c01048a3>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > ======================= > calling init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list+0x0/0x20 > initcall init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list+0x0/0x20 returned 0 after 0 msecs > calling net_ns_init+0x0/0x190 > net_namespace: 676 bytes > initcall net_ns_init+0x0/0x190 returned 0 after 0 msecs > calling cpufreq_tsc+0x0/0x20 > initcall cpufreq_tsc+0x0/0x20 returned 0 after 0 msecs > calling reboot_init+0x0/0x20 > initcall reboot_init+0x0/0x20 returned 0 after 0 msecs > calling print_banner+0x0/0x10 > Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware > > <----------------------- > > my guess is on: > > commit 1f7b94cd3d564901f9e04a8bc5832ae7bfd690a0 > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date: Tue Aug 5 09:21:44 2008 -0700 > > rcu: classic RCU locking and memory-barrier cleanups > > Ingo Fixes a problem detected by lockdep in which rcu->lock was acquired both in irq context and in process context, but without disabling from process context. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-15rcu: classic RCU locking and memory-barrier cleanupsPaul E. McKenney
This patch simplifies the locking and memory-barrier usage in the Classic RCU grace-period-detection mechanism, incorporating Lai Jiangshan's feedback from the earlier version (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/1/400 and http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/3/43). Passed 10 hours of rcutorture concurrent with CPUs being put online and taken offline on a 128-hardware-thread Power machine. My apologies to whoever in the Eastern Hemisphere was planning to use this machine over the Western Hemisphere night, but it was sitting idle and... So this is ready for tip/core/rcu. This patch is in preparation for moving to a hierarchical algorithm to allow the very large SMP machines -- requested by some people at OLS, and there seem to have been a few recent patches in the 4096-CPU direction as well. The general idea is to move to a much more conservative concurrency design, then apply a hierarchy to reduce contention on the global lock by a few orders of magnitude (larger machines would see greater reductions). The reason for taking a conservative approach is that this code isn't on any fast path. Prototype in progress. This patch is against the linux-tip git tree (tip/core/rcu). If you wish to test this against 2.6.26, use the following set of patches: http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/patches/2.6.26-ljsimp-1.patch http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/patches/2.6.26-ljsimpfix-3.patch The first patch combines commits 5127bed588a2f8f3a1f732de2a8a190b7df5dce3 and 3cac97cbb14aed00d83eb33d4613b0fe3aaea863 from Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, and the second patch contains my changes. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-15rcu: prevent console flood when one CPU sees another AWOL via RCUPaul E. McKenney
One small change needed to keep from flooding the console when one CPU notices that another is AWOL. Unless I am missing something subtle. Otherwise the cleanups look good! Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-11rcu, debug: detect stalled grace periods, cleanupsIngo Molnar
small cleanups. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-11rcu, debug: detect stalled grace periodsPaul E. McKenney
this is a diagnostic patch for Classic RCU. The approach is to record a timestamp at the beginning of the grace period (in rcu_start_batch()), then have rcu_check_callbacks() complain if: 1. it is running on a CPU that has holding up grace periods for a long time (say one second). This will identify the culprit assuming that the culprit has not disabled hardware irqs, instruction execution, or some such. 2. it is running on a CPU that is not holding up grace periods, but grace periods have been held up for an even longer time (say two seconds). It is enabled via the default-off CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_STALL kernel parameter. Rather than exponential backoff, it backs off to once per 30 seconds. My feeling upon thinking on it was that if you have stalled RCU grace periods for that long, a few extra printk() messages are probably the least of your worries... Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: David Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-11Merge branch 'linus' into core/rcuIngo Molnar
2008-07-28stop_machine: Wean existing callers off stop_machine_run()Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2008-07-18rcu classic: new algorithm for callbacks-processing(v2)Lai Jiangshan
This is v2, it's a little deference from v1 that I had send to lkml. use ACCESS_ONCE use rcu_batch_after/rcu_batch_before for batch # comparison. rcutorture test result: (hotplugs: do cpu-online/offline once per second) No CONFIG_NO_HZ: OK, 12hours No CONFIG_NO_HZ, hotplugs: OK, 12hours CONFIG_NO_HZ=y: OK, 24hours CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, hotplugs: Failed. (Failed also without my patch applied, exactly the same bug occurred, http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/3/24) v1's email thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/2/539 v1's description: The code/algorithm of the implement of current callbacks-processing is very efficient and technical. But when I studied it and I found a disadvantage: In multi-CPU systems, when a new RCU callback is being queued(call_rcu[_bh]), this callback will be invoked after the grace period for the batch with batch number = rcp->cur+2 has completed very very likely in current implement. Actually, this callback can be invoked after the grace period for the batch with batch number = rcp->cur+1 has completed. The delay of invocation means that latency of synchronize_rcu() is extended. But more important thing is that the callbacks usually free memory, and these works are delayed too! it's necessary for reclaimer to free memory as soon as possible when left memory is few. A very simple way can solve this problem: a field(struct rcu_head::batch) is added to record the batch number for the RCU callback. And when a new RCU callback is being queued, we determine the batch number for this callback(head->batch = rcp->cur+1) and we move this callback to rdp->donelist if we find that head->batch <= rcp->completed when we process callbacks. This simple way reduces the wait time for invocation a lot. (about 2.5Grace Period -> 1.5Grace Period in average in multi-CPU systems) This is my algorithm. But I do not add any field for struct rcu_head in my implement. We just need to memorize the last 2 batches and their batch number, because these 2 batches include all entries that for whom the grace period hasn't completed. So we use a special linked-list rather than add a field. Please see the comment of struct rcu_data. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-18rcu classic: simplify the next pending batchLai Jiangshan
use a batch number(rcp->pending) instead of a flag(rcp->next_pending) rcu_start_batch() need to change this flag, so mb()s is needed for memory-access safe. but(after this patch applied) rcu_start_batch() do not change this batch number(rcp->pending), rcp->pending is managed by __rcu_process_callbacks only, and troublesome mb()s are eliminated. And codes look simpler and clearer. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-16Merge branch 'linus' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/xen/smp.c kernel/sched_rt.c net/iucv/iucv.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-15Merge branch 'core/rcu' into core/rcu-for-linusIngo Molnar
2008-07-14Merge branch 'core/softirq' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'core/softirq' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: softirq: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable softirq: remove initialization of static per-cpu variable Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL
2008-07-13rcu classic: update qlen when cpu offlineLai Jiangshan
When callbacks are moved from offline cpu to this cpu, the qlen field of this rdp should be updated. [ Paul E. McKenney: ] The effect of this bug would be for force_quiescent_state() to be invoked when it should not and vice versa -- wasting cycles in the first case and letting RCU callbacks remain piled up in the second case. The bug is thus "benign" in that it does not result in premature grace-period termination, but should of course be fixed nonetheless. Preemption is disabled by the caller's get_cpu_var(), so we are guaranteed to remain on the same CPU, as required. The local_irq_disable() is indeed needed, otherwise, an interrupt might invoke call_rcu() or call_rcu_bh(), which could cause that interrupt's increment of ->qlen to be lost. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-11Merge branch 'linus' into core/rcuIngo Molnar
Conflicts: include/linux/rculist.h kernel/rcupreempt.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-06Merge commit 'v2.6.26-rc9' into cpus4096Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01rcu: fix hotplug vs rcu raceGautham R Shenoy
Dhaval Giani reported this warning during cpu hotplug stress-tests: | On running kernel compiles in parallel with cpu hotplug: | | WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:118 | native_smp_send_reschedule+0x21/0x36() | Modules linked in: | Pid: 27483, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #1 | [...] | [<c0110355>] native_smp_send_reschedule+0x21/0x36 | [<c014fe8f>] force_quiescent_state+0x47/0x57 | [<c014fef0>] call_rcu+0x51/0x6d | [<c01713b3>] __fput+0x130/0x158 | [<c0171231>] fput+0x17/0x19 | [<c016fd99>] filp_close+0x4d/0x57 | [<c016fdff>] sys_close+0x5c/0x97 IMHO the warning is a spurious one. cpu_online_map is updated by the _cpu_down() using stop_machine_run(). Since force_quiescent_state is invoked from irqs disabled section, stop_machine_run() won't be executing while a cpu is executing force_quiescent_state(). Hence the cpu_online_map is stable while we're in the irq disabled section. However, a cpu might have been offlined _just_ before we disabled irqs while entering force_quiescent_state(). And rcu subsystem might not yet have handled the CPU_DEAD notification, leading to the offlined cpu's bit being set in the rcp->cpumask. Hence cpumask = (rcp->cpumask & cpu_online_map) to prevent sending smp_reschedule() to an offlined CPU. Here's the timeline: CPU_A CPU_B -------------------------------------------------------------- cpu_down(): . . . . . stop_machine(): /* disables preemption, . * and irqs */ . . . . . take_cpu_down(); . . . . . . . cpu_disable(); /*this removes cpu . *from cpu_online_map . */ . . . . . restart_machine(); /* enables irqs */ . ------WINDOW DURING WHICH rcp->cpumask is stale --------------- . call_rcu(); . /* disables irqs here */ . .force_quiescent_state(); .CPU_DEAD: .for_each_cpu(rcp->cpumask) . . smp_send_reschedule(); . . . . WARN_ON() for offlined CPU! . . . rcu_cpu_notify: . -------- WINDOW ENDS ------------------------------------------ rcu_offline_cpu() /* Which calls cpu_quiet() * which removes * cpu from rcp->cpumask. */ If a new batch was started just before calling stop_machine_run(), the "tobe-offlined" cpu is still present in rcp-cpumask. During a cpu-offline, from take_cpu_down(), we queue an rt-prio idle task as the next task to be picked by the scheduler. We also call cpu_disable() which will disable any further interrupts and remove the cpu's bit from the cpu_online_map. Once the stop_machine_run() successfully calls take_cpu_down(), it calls schedule(). That's the last time a schedule is called on the offlined cpu, and hence the last time when rdp->passed_quiesc will be set to 1 through rcu_qsctr_inc(). But the cpu_quiet() will be on this cpu will be called only when the next RCU_SOFTIRQ occurs on this CPU. So at this time, the offlined CPU is still set in rcp->cpumask. Now coming back to the idle_task which truely offlines the CPU, it does check for a pending RCU and raises the softirq, since it will find rdp->passed_quiesc to be 0 in this case. However, since the cpu is offline I am not sure if the softirq will trigger on the CPU. Even if it doesn't the rcu_offline_cpu() will find that rcp->completed is not the same as rcp->cur, which means that our cpu could be holding up the grace period progression. Hence we call cpu_quiet() and move ahead. But because of the window explained in the timeline, we could still have a call_rcu() before the RCU subsystem executes it's CPU_DEAD notification, and we send smp_send_reschedule() to offlined cpu while trying to force the quiescent states. The appended patch adds comments and prevents checking for offlined cpu everytime. cpu_online_map is updated by the _cpu_down() using stop_machine_run(). Since force_quiescent_state is invoked from irqs disabled section, stop_machine_run() won't be executing while a cpu is executing force_quiescent_state(). Hence the cpu_online_map is stable while we're in the irq disabled section. Reported-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-25Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULLCarlos R. Mafra
As git-grep shows, open_softirq() is always called with the last argument being NULL block/blk-core.c: open_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, blk_done_softirq, NULL); kernel/hrtimer.c: open_softirq(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_hrtimer_softirq, NULL); kernel/rcuclassic.c: open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL); kernel/rcupreempt.c: open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL); kernel/sched.c: open_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ, run_rebalance_domains, NULL); kernel/softirq.c: open_softirq(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_action, NULL); kernel/softirq.c: open_softirq(HI_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_hi_action, NULL); kernel/timer.c: open_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_timer_softirq, NULL); net/core/dev.c: open_softirq(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ, net_tx_action, NULL); net/core/dev.c: open_softirq(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ, net_rx_action, NULL); This observation has already been made by Matthew Wilcox in June 2002 (http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-25/0687.html) "I notice that none of the current softirq routines use the data element passed to them." and the situation hasn't changed since them. So it appears we can safely remove that extra argument to save 128 (54) bytes of kernel data (text). Signed-off-by: Carlos R. Mafra <crmafra@ift.unesp.br> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-23core: use performance variant for_each_cpu_mask_nrMike Travis
Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr where appropriate Reviewed-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-19rcu: add memory barriers and comments to rcu_check_callbacks()Paul E. McKenney
Add comments to the logic that infers quiescent states when interrupting from either user mode or the idle loop. Also add a memory barrier: it appears that James Huang was in fact onto something, as the scheduler is much less synchronization happy than it once was, so we can no longer rely on its memory barriers in all cases. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: James Huang <jamesclhuang@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-25Preempt-RCU: implementationPaul E. McKenney
This patch implements a new version of RCU which allows its read-side critical sections to be preempted. It uses a set of counter pairs to keep track of the read-side critical sections and flips them when all tasks exit read-side critical section. The details of this implementation can be found in this paper - http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/OLSrtRCU.2006.08.11a.pdf and the article- http://lwn.net/Articles/253651/ This patch was developed as a part of the -rt kernel development and meant to provide better latencies when read-side critical sections of RCU don't disable preemption. As a consequence of keeping track of RCU readers, the readers have a slight overhead (optimizations in the paper). This implementation co-exists with the "classic" RCU implementations and can be switched to at compiler. Also includes RCU tracing summarized in debugfs. [ akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fixes on non-preempt architectures ] Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25Preempt-RCU: fix rcu_barrier for preemptive environment.Paul E. McKenney
Fix rcu_barrier() to work properly in preemptive kernel environment. Also, the ordering of callback must be preserved while moving callbacks to another CPU during CPU hotplug. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25Preempt-RCU: reorganize RCU code into rcuclassic.c and rcupdate.cPaul E. McKenney
This patch re-organizes the RCU code to enable multiple implementations of RCU. Users of RCU continues to include rcupdate.h and the RCU interfaces remain the same. This is in preparation for subsequently merging the preemptible RCU implementation. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>