aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-04-25[NET]: cleanup extra semicolonsStephen Hemminger
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-25[SCTP]: Implement SCTP_PARTIAL_DELIVERY_POINT option.Vlad Yasevich
This option induces partial delivery to run as soon as the specified amount of data has been accumulated on the association. However, we give preference to fully reassembled messages over PD messages. In any case, window and buffer is freed up. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@.hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-25[SCTP]: Implement SCTP_FRAGMENT_INTERLEAVE socket optionVlad Yasevich
This option was introduced in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-13. It prevents head-of-line blocking in the case of one-to-many endpoint. Applications enabling this option really must enable SCTP_SNDRCV event so that they would know where the data belongs. Based on an earlier patch by Ivan Skytte Jørgensen. Additionally, this functionality now permits multiple associations on the same endpoint to enter Partial Delivery. Applications should be extra careful, when using this functionality, to track EOR indicators. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-18[SCTP]: Do not interleave non-fragments when in partial deliveryVlad Yasevich
The way partial delivery is currently implemnted, it is possible to intereleave a message (either from another steram, or unordered) that is not part of partial delivery process. The only way to this is for a message to not be a fragment and be 'in order' or unorderd for a given stream. This will result in bypassing the reassembly/ordering queues where things live duing partial delivery, and the message will be delivered to the socket in the middle of partial delivery. This is a two-fold problem, in that: 1. the app now must check the stream-id and flags which it may not be doing. 2. this clearing partial delivery state from the association and results in ulp hanging. This patch is a band-aid over a much bigger problem in that we don't do stream interleave. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-03-20[SCTP]: Clean up stale data during association restartVlad Yasevich
During association restart we may have stale data sitting on the ULP queue waiting for ordering or reassembly. This data may cause severe problems if not cleaned up. In particular stale data pending ordering may cause problems with receive window exhaustion if our peer has decided to restart the association. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-02-10[NET] SCTP: Fix whitespace errors.YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-10-11[SCTP]: Fix receive buffer accounting.Vlad Yasevich
When doing receiver buffer accounting, we always used skb->truesize. This is problematic when processing bundled DATA chunks because for every DATA chunk that could be small part of one large skb, we would charge the size of the entire skb. The new approach is to store the size of the DATA chunk we are accounting for in the sctp_ulpevent structure and use that stored value for accounting. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-05-05[SCTP]: Prevent possible infinite recursion with multiple bundled DATA.Vladislav Yasevich
There is a rare situation that causes lksctp to go into infinite recursion and crash the system. The trigger is a packet that contains at least the first two DATA fragments of a message bundled together. The recursion is triggered when the user data buffer is smaller that the full data message. The problem is that we clone the skb for every fragment in the message. When reassembling the full message, we try to link skbs from the "first fragment" clone using the frag_list. However, since the frag_list is shared between two clones in this rare situation, we end up setting the frag_list pointer of the second fragment to point to itself. This causes sctp_skb_pull() to potentially recurse indefinitely. Proposed solution is to make a copy of the skb when attempting to link things using frag_list. Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vladsilav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-10-08[PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1Al Viro
- added typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t; - replaced __nocast uses for gfp flags with gfp_t - it gives exactly the same warnings as far as sparse is concerned, doesn't change generated code (from gcc point of view we replaced unsigned int with typedef) and documents what's going on far better. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-29[NET]: Kill skb->listDavid S. Miller
Remove the "list" member of struct sk_buff, as it is entirely redundant. All SKB list removal callers know which list the SKB is on, so storing this in sk_buff does nothing other than taking up some space. Two tricky bits were SCTP, which I took care of, and two ATM drivers which Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> fixed up. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
2005-07-11[SCTP]: __nocast annotationsAlexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!