1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
/*
* IPVS: Shortest Expected Delay scheduling module
*
* Authors: Wensong Zhang <wensong@linuxvirtualserver.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* Changes:
*
*/
/*
* The SED algorithm attempts to minimize each job's expected delay until
* completion. The expected delay that the job will experience is
* (Ci + 1) / Ui if sent to the ith server, in which Ci is the number of
* jobs on the ith server and Ui is the fixed service rate (weight) of
* the ith server. The SED algorithm adopts a greedy policy that each does
* what is in its own best interest, i.e. to join the queue which would
* minimize its expected delay of completion.
*
* See the following paper for more information:
* A. Weinrib and S. Shenker, Greed is not enough: Adaptive load sharing
* in large heterogeneous systems. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM'88,
* pages 986-994, 1988.
*
* Thanks must go to Marko Buuri <marko@buuri.name> for talking SED to me.
*
* The difference between SED and WLC is that SED includes the incoming
* job in the cost function (the increment of 1). SED may outperform
* WLC, while scheduling big jobs under larger heterogeneous systems
* (the server weight varies a lot).
*
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <net/ip_vs.h>
static inline unsigned int
ip_vs_sed_dest_overhead(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
{
/*
* We only use the active connection number in the cost
* calculation here.
*/
return atomic_read(&dest->activeconns) + 1;
}
/*
* Weighted Least Connection scheduling
*/
static struct ip_vs_dest *
ip_vs_sed_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct ip_vs_dest *dest, *least;
unsigned int loh, doh;
IP_VS_DBG(6, "ip_vs_sed_schedule(): Scheduling...\n");
/*
* We calculate the load of each dest server as follows:
* (server expected overhead) / dest->weight
*
* Remember -- no floats in kernel mode!!!
* The comparison of h1*w2 > h2*w1 is equivalent to that of
* h1/w1 > h2/w2
* if every weight is larger than zero.
*
* The server with weight=0 is quiesced and will not receive any
* new connections.
*/
list_for_each_entry(dest, &svc->destinations, n_list) {
if (!(dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD) &&
atomic_read(&dest->weight) > 0) {
least = dest;
loh = ip_vs_sed_dest_overhead(least);
goto nextstage;
}
}
return NULL;
/*
* Find the destination with the least load.
*/
nextstage:
list_for_each_entry_continue(dest, &svc->destinations, n_list) {
if (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD)
continue;
doh = ip_vs_sed_dest_overhead(dest);
if (loh * atomic_read(&dest->weight) >
doh * atomic_read(&least->weight)) {
least = dest;
loh = doh;
}
}
IP_VS_DBG(6, "SED: server %u.%u.%u.%u:%u "
"activeconns %d refcnt %d weight %d overhead %d\n",
NIPQUAD(least->addr.ip), ntohs(least->port),
atomic_read(&least->activeconns),
atomic_read(&least->refcnt),
atomic_read(&least->weight), loh);
return least;
}
static struct ip_vs_scheduler ip_vs_sed_scheduler =
{
.name = "sed",
.refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
.module = THIS_MODULE,
.n_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(ip_vs_sed_scheduler.n_list),
.schedule = ip_vs_sed_schedule,
};
static int __init ip_vs_sed_init(void)
{
return register_ip_vs_scheduler(&ip_vs_sed_scheduler);
}
static void __exit ip_vs_sed_cleanup(void)
{
unregister_ip_vs_scheduler(&ip_vs_sed_scheduler);
}
module_init(ip_vs_sed_init);
module_exit(ip_vs_sed_cleanup);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|
