diff options
author | Thomas White <taw@physics.org> | 2021-07-05 14:34:02 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas White <taw@physics.org> | 2021-07-05 14:34:02 +0200 |
commit | ea2bf83a3b345b3edfef116f9716ab57e72b143a (patch) | |
tree | f64a0e448bf5b03dd72e774c45a2e8d82380b414 /doc | |
parent | 7de725cd220aee0adee42b8295c4b48aedaa5127 (diff) |
Add article about speed
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/articles/speed.rst | 53 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/articles/speed.rst b/doc/articles/speed.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..749f65be --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/articles/speed.rst @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +===================================== +How to increase data processing speed +===================================== + +You want ``indexamajig`` to run faster? You're probably already using ``-j``, +causing it to divide its work between parallel processes. Maybe you're even +already using a compute cluster with a batch system, via the GUI or the +``turbo-index-slurm`` and ``turbo-index-lsf`` scripts. But you want even more +speed? Here are some tips for getting things to run as fast as possible: + +* If you're using a high-resolution detector such as an Eiger 16M, consider + whether you really need the full resolution or not. Most experiments don't + need anything close to 16 megapixel resolution. If not, bin the detector + frames down to 4M or even 1M. This makes a huge difference because the peak + search algorithm must look at all pixels, so binning your data from 16M to 4M + can make it four times faster. Note that the peak search is one of the only + processing stages which needs to be done on every single frame. + +* For a similar reason, avoid defining bad regions in x/y coordinates. If you + can, define them in fs/ss coordinates instead, or use in-band bad pixel + flags (i.e. set the bad pixel values to NaN). If you specify bad regions in + x/y coordinates, CrystFEL has to figure out which detector pixels fall into + the specified area in the lab coordinate system, and currently this uses a + slow method. + +* Use ``--min-peaks``, so that only plausible hits get processed. At the same + time, add ``--no-non-hits-in-stream`` so that time and disk space isn't used + for recording information about non-hits. + +* Avoid HDF5 files which use compression, as well as the "virtual data set" + feature. Obviously, this may involve a trade-off with disk space and data + organisation. + +* Don't use PinkIndexer, unless you really need it (wide bandwidth or electron + diffraction data). PinkIndexer is a very general and accurate indexing + algorithm, but its generality makes it very slow. Prefer DirAx, TakeTwo, + Mosflm and XGandalf. + +* Use ``-no-retry`` and ``--no-multi``. This will probably decrease fraction + of indexed frames somewhat, but the trade-off might be positive for your data. + +* Restrict the resolution of data for integration by setting ``indexamajig + --push-res``. This affects data quality, so you will need to try different + values to find the best one. Normally, we recommend limiting the resolution + only at the merging stage (``partialator --push-res``), because this gives + you the most flexibility - you can set any ``--push-res`` value without + re-integrating the entire dataset. If you limit the resolution at the + integration stage, the number of reflections to be integrated will be much + smaller, which can lead to a significant speed improvement. However, the + ``--push-res`` value that you use for merging must be smaller than the value + used for integration. If you don't know where to start with this option, try + ``--push-res=1.5``. + |