| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there are large changes in intensity between shells, the R-factor should reflect it.
The old formulation did not have that property. Weak resolution shells would show up
with low R-factors because they contributed very little to the overall R-factor, but
the actual correspondence between intensities could still be very poor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the wavelength gets put into the HDF5 file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without chomp(), the string comparison never works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit ae51e75490daf47e2deefe83e72a1f5c092fa023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturated pixels seem to be OK during initial peak search
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's an incomplete list, so let's not pretend otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should make it much more obvious (via check-near-bragg) when the peak positions are wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
