Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Needed to see the minimum in profile radius
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bit nasty, but avoids lots of NANs
|
|
|
|
|
|
It just takes too long.
|
|
The time taken was excessive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first and at end
Also, do it in parallel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the wavelength is going to be refined and shouldn't be shared.
In the future, the wavelength should somehow be refined jointly between
multi-crystal images.
|
|
Happens if the initial position is close to a tight minimum, so all
simplex vertices have bad values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what the GSL manual says should be done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As long as it doesn't end up somewhere bad, it can probe where it likes.
|