Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduced by b6af09d78d49d552a05b81bd20a7854a180373f5
|
|
|
|
Can use kpred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beam)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bit nasty, but avoids lots of NANs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "improved" version of this, added by 9b1374999 along with the new
spot position calculation for out-of-plane panels, actually assumes that
the reflection is at the exact Bragg condition. This is not a valid
assumption here. The difference is small (<0.5 px), but made the
prediction refinement gradients completely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... even if we are updating a previous reflection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|